header-logo header-logo

23 October 2019 / Winston Jacob , Toby Walker
Issue: 7861 / Categories: Features , Costs , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

To be (dis)continued…

9862
Winston Jacob & Toby Walker analyse the latest approach to costs on discontinuance
  • What happens if a defendant to a claim gives the claimant the relief it seeks post-issue but without an admission of liability and the claimant therefore discontinues the claim?

CPR 38.6(1) sets out the general principle to be applied on discontinuance of a claim: ‘Unless the court orders otherwise, a claimant who discontinues is liable for the costs which a defendant against whom the claimant discontinues incurred on or before the date on which notice of discontinuance was served on the defendant.’

In Nelson’s Yard Management Co v Eziefula [2013] EWCA Civ 235, [2013] CP Rep 29, [2013] All ER (D) 216 (Mar) Lord Justice Beatson stated, at [32]-[33], that: ‘… the mere fact that a claimant has got all or almost all he could reasonably hope to achieve from the proceedings has been said not to justify a claimant from relying on the avoidance of a trial which would be solely about liability to recover costs as justifying

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll