header-logo header-logo

23 October 2019 / Winston Jacob , Toby Walker
Issue: 7861 / Categories: Features , Costs , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

To be (dis)continued…

9862
Winston Jacob & Toby Walker analyse the latest approach to costs on discontinuance
  • What happens if a defendant to a claim gives the claimant the relief it seeks post-issue but without an admission of liability and the claimant therefore discontinues the claim?

CPR 38.6(1) sets out the general principle to be applied on discontinuance of a claim: ‘Unless the court orders otherwise, a claimant who discontinues is liable for the costs which a defendant against whom the claimant discontinues incurred on or before the date on which notice of discontinuance was served on the defendant.’

In Nelson’s Yard Management Co v Eziefula [2013] EWCA Civ 235, [2013] CP Rep 29, [2013] All ER (D) 216 (Mar) Lord Justice Beatson stated, at [32]-[33], that: ‘… the mere fact that a claimant has got all or almost all he could reasonably hope to achieve from the proceedings has been said not to justify a claimant from relying on the avoidance of a trial which would be solely about liability to recover costs as justifying

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield welcomes new employment partner, Tom McLaughlin

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

National specialist pensions law firm strengthens team with three new appointments

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit appoints Christian Abletshauser to lead family law practice

NEWS
Burges Salmon appoints Benn Richards to strengthen Contentious Insolvency offering
A High Court decision has clarified that a home may be unfit for human habitation not only where conditions endanger health or safety, but also where they seriously undermine comfort and convenience

A longer time limit for employment tribunal claims, new charity law thresholds, property tribunal recruitment and appellate guidance on small-claims costs feature in the latest Civil Way round-up

A recent High Court ruling could make issue estoppel considerably more complex in cross-border litigation, requiring parties to consider the foreign law governing the underlying claim
The Supreme Court has overturned Cheshire West’s bright-line test for deprivation of liberty, replacing it with a broader, more contextual assessment that gives greater weight to an individual’s wishes, feelings and apparent consent
back-to-top-scroll