header-logo header-logo

To be (dis)continued…

23 October 2019 / Winston Jacob , Toby Walker
Issue: 7861 / Categories: Features , Costs , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
9862
Winston Jacob & Toby Walker analyse the latest approach to costs on discontinuance
  • What happens if a defendant to a claim gives the claimant the relief it seeks post-issue but without an admission of liability and the claimant therefore discontinues the claim?

CPR 38.6(1) sets out the general principle to be applied on discontinuance of a claim: ‘Unless the court orders otherwise, a claimant who discontinues is liable for the costs which a defendant against whom the claimant discontinues incurred on or before the date on which notice of discontinuance was served on the defendant.’

In Nelson’s Yard Management Co v Eziefula [2013] EWCA Civ 235, [2013] CP Rep 29, [2013] All ER (D) 216 (Mar) Lord Justice Beatson stated, at [32]-[33], that: ‘… the mere fact that a claimant has got all or almost all he could reasonably hope to achieve from the proceedings has been said not to justify a claimant from relying on the avoidance of a trial which would be solely about liability to recover costs as justifying

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll