header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

The Online Safety Act: too little, too late?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
22 March 2024 / Thomas Rudkin , Emily Costello
Issue: 8064 / Categories: Features , Cyber , Cybercrime , Technology , Privacy , Criminal , Artificial intelligence
printer mail-detail
164871
A timely step in the right direction or a late arrival? Thomas Rudkin & Emily Costello share their verdict on the Online Safety Act
  • The Online Safety Act 2023 sets out criminal offences relating to malicious online activity, including cyberflashing, revenge porn, and threatening communications.
  • ‘Deepfakes’ and the rapid rise of online communications have brought these offences to public attention recently. Has the Act come at the right time to address new technologies—including those yet to come—or has the damage already been done?

The long-awaited Online Safety Act 2023, says the government, aims to make the UK ‘the safest place in the world to be online’. Whether the Act meets this aim is yet to be seen, with most provisions yet to come into force. However, it contains ambitious new provisions and obligations that have the potential to change the legal landscape dramatically. One of the ways it does this is by creating a litany of new criminal offences.

From 31 January

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
National Pro Bono Centre—Esther McConnell & Sarah Oliver Scemla

National Pro Bono Centre—Esther McConnell & Sarah Oliver Scemla

Charity strengthens leadership as national Pro Bono Week takes place

Michelman Robinson—Akshay Sewlikar

Michelman Robinson—Akshay Sewlikar

Dual-qualified partner joins London disputes practice

McDermott Will & Schulte—Karen Butler

McDermott Will & Schulte—Karen Butler

Transactions practice welcomes partner in London office

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Form N510—not just a box to tick
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold dives into the quirks of civil practice, from the Court of Appeal’s fierce defence of form N510 to fresh reminders about compliance and interest claims, in this week's Civil Way
NLJ this week: When high rates fall flat
In this week's NLJ, Sophie Houghton of LexisPSL distils the key lesson from recent costs cases: if you want to exceed guideline hourly rates (GHR), you must prove why
NLJ this week: Building digital bridges to justice
With chronic underfunding and rising demand leaving thousands without legal help, technology could transform access to justice—if handled wisely, writes Professor Sue Prince of the University of Exeter in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Delegation or dereliction?
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) has restated a fundamental truth, writes John Gould, chair of Russell-Cooke, in this week's NLJ: only authorised persons can conduct litigation. The decision sparked alarm, but Gould stresses it merely confirms the Legal Services Act 2007
NLJ this week: FCA faces its toughest test yet
The government’s decision to make the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) the Single Professional Services Supervisor marks a watershed in the UK’s fight against money laundering, says Rebecca Hughes of Corker Binning in this week's NLJ. The FCA will now oversee 60,000 firms across legal and accountancy sectors—a massive expansion of remit that raises questions over resources and readiness 
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll