header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

The Online Safety Act: too little, too late?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
22 March 2024 / Thomas Rudkin , Emily Costello
Issue: 8064 / Categories: Features , Cyber , Cybercrime , Technology , Privacy , Criminal , Artificial intelligence
printer mail-detail
164871
A timely step in the right direction or a late arrival? Thomas Rudkin & Emily Costello share their verdict on the Online Safety Act
  • The Online Safety Act 2023 sets out criminal offences relating to malicious online activity, including cyberflashing, revenge porn, and threatening communications.
  • ‘Deepfakes’ and the rapid rise of online communications have brought these offences to public attention recently. Has the Act come at the right time to address new technologies—including those yet to come—or has the damage already been done?

The long-awaited Online Safety Act 2023, says the government, aims to make the UK ‘the safest place in the world to be online’. Whether the Act meets this aim is yet to be seen, with most provisions yet to come into force. However, it contains ambitious new provisions and obligations that have the potential to change the legal landscape dramatically. One of the ways it does this is by creating a litany of new criminal offences.

From 31 January

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Mourant—Stephen Alexander

Mourant—Stephen Alexander

Jersey litigation lead appointed to global STEP Council

mfg Solicitors—nine trainees

mfg Solicitors—nine trainees

Firm invests in future talent with new training cohort

360 Law Group—Anthony Gahan

360 Law Group—Anthony Gahan

Investment banking veteran appointed as chairman to drive global growth

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: AI boom collides with courtroom reality
Artificial intelligence may be revolutionising the law, but its misuse could wreck cases and careers, warns Clare Arthurs of Penningtons Manches Cooper in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Pro bono power without the red tape
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Small firms call for tech clarity as AI looms
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Trans pool player loses discrimination fight
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Traders’ convictions quashed in Libor shock
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll