header-logo header-logo

25 March 2016 / Chantal-Aimée Doerries KC
Issue: 7692 / Categories: Opinion , Profession
printer mail-detail

Too much, too soon

Chantal-Aimée Doerries QC warns against the rush to embrace online justice

Lord Justice Briggs’ recent interim report, Civil Courts Structure Review, covers a number of areas. The proposal which has received the most attention is the so-called “online court” (OC), fairly acknowledged by Lord Justice Briggs as “the single most radical and important structural change” with which his interim report is concerned. There are few who would dispute that the court system, and the experience of many a litigant and judge, could be substantially improved by the use of digital tools and modern information technology (IT). And it is good news indeed that at least for IT the government has committed necessary funds for investment in our justice system. But we need to be careful how and when, and to what extent, we make use of modern technology, and indeed how much faith we place in it. Many of the major government IT projects have a history of costly failure either in conception or implementation and those that have completed have often been

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll