header-logo header-logo

25 March 2016 / Chantal-Aimée Doerries KC
Issue: 7692 / Categories: Opinion , Profession
printer mail-detail

Too much, too soon

Chantal-Aimée Doerries QC warns against the rush to embrace online justice

Lord Justice Briggs’ recent interim report, Civil Courts Structure Review, covers a number of areas. The proposal which has received the most attention is the so-called “online court” (OC), fairly acknowledged by Lord Justice Briggs as “the single most radical and important structural change” with which his interim report is concerned. There are few who would dispute that the court system, and the experience of many a litigant and judge, could be substantially improved by the use of digital tools and modern information technology (IT). And it is good news indeed that at least for IT the government has committed necessary funds for investment in our justice system. But we need to be careful how and when, and to what extent, we make use of modern technology, and indeed how much faith we place in it. Many of the major government IT projects have a history of costly failure either in conception or implementation and those that have completed have often been

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—Nathan Evans

Birketts—Nathan Evans

Commercial and technology team in Cambridge strengthened by partner hire

Andrew & Andrew Solicitors—Shikha Datta

Andrew & Andrew Solicitors—Shikha Datta

Hampshire firm appoints head of new family department

Latham & Watkins—Sarah Lightdale

Latham & Watkins—Sarah Lightdale

Firm strengthens securities practice with partner return

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll