header-logo header-logo

Too much, too soon

25 March 2016 / Chantal-Aimée Doerries KC
Issue: 7692 / Categories: Opinion , Profession
printer mail-detail

Chantal-Aimée Doerries QC warns against the rush to embrace online justice

Lord Justice Briggs’ recent interim report, Civil Courts Structure Review, covers a number of areas. The proposal which has received the most attention is the so-called “online court” (OC), fairly acknowledged by Lord Justice Briggs as “the single most radical and important structural change” with which his interim report is concerned. There are few who would dispute that the court system, and the experience of many a litigant and judge, could be substantially improved by the use of digital tools and modern information technology (IT). And it is good news indeed that at least for IT the government has committed necessary funds for investment in our justice system. But we need to be careful how and when, and to what extent, we make use of modern technology, and indeed how much faith we place in it. Many of the major government IT projects have a history of costly failure either in conception or implementation and those that have completed have often been

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Ian D’Costa

Arc Pensions Law—Ian D’Costa

Pensions firm welcomes legal director in London

Shakespeare Martineau—Jonathan Warren

Shakespeare Martineau—Jonathan Warren

Real estate disputes team strengthened by London partner hire

Morgan Lewis—Christian Tuddenham

Morgan Lewis—Christian Tuddenham

Litigation partner joins disputes team in London

NEWS
Government plans for offender ‘restriction zones’ risk creating ‘digital cages’ that blur punishment with surveillance, warns Henrietta Ronson, partner at Corker Binning, in this week's issue of NLJ
Louise Uphill, senior associate at Moore Barlow LLP, dissects the faltering rollout of the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 in this week's NLJ
Judgments are ‘worthless without enforcement’, says HHJ Karen Walden-Smith, senior circuit judge and chair of the Civil Justice Council’s enforcement working group. In this week's NLJ, she breaks down the CJC’s April 2025 report, which identified systemic flaws and proposed 39 reforms, from modernising procedures to protecting vulnerable debtors
Writing in NLJ this week, Katherine Harding and Charlotte Finley of Penningtons Manches Cooper examine Standish v Standish [2025] UKSC 26, the Supreme Court ruling that narrowed what counts as matrimonial property, and its potential impact upon claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
In this week's NLJ, Dr Jon Robins, editor of The Justice Gap and lecturer at Brighton University, reports on a campaign to posthumously exonerate Christine Keeler. 60 years after her perjury conviction, Keeler’s son Seymour Platt has petitioned the king to exercise the royal prerogative of mercy, arguing she was a victim of violence and moral hypocrisy, not deceit. Supported by Felicity Gerry KC, the dossier brands the conviction 'the ultimate in slut-shaming'
back-to-top-scroll