header-logo header-logo

19 March 2014
Issue: 7599 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Too powerful?

Master of the Rolls issues warning over criticism of European Court of Human Rights

Lord Dyson, Master of the Rolls, considered the question of, “Are the judges too powerful?”, in a speech to the UCL Bentham Association last week. He offered an interesting response to Lord Sumption’s recent assertions on the subject of judicial powers in his Kuala Lumpur lecture, and said he regretted that judges had “descended into the arena” of arguments over the European Court of Human Rights, giving an impression that the “entire judiciary” was critical of it. This impression had been created by “a small number of lectures given by a few senior judges”, who had not claimed to speak on behalf of their colleagues.

Issue: 7599 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll