header-logo header-logo

Tort

05 June 2015
Issue: 7655 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Gulati and others v MGN Ltd [2015] EWHC 1482 (Ch), [2015] All ER (D) 199 (May)

The claimants issued proceedings for the infringements of privacy rights founded on phone hacking, private investigators and publication of articles in the defendant’s newspapers. The present eight cases were brought as part of a managed litigation to ascertain damages and give some guidance as to the damages in other cases. The Chancery Division found the claimants were entitled to compensation for more than distress. Several awards for the hacking, the blagging of personal information by the private investigators and in respect of the published articles would be appropriate, while being conscious to avoid double counting. Further, awards of aggravated damages would be appropriate.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Chester office

Slater Heelis—Chester office

North West presence strengthened with Chester office launch

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Firm grows commercial disputes expertise with partner promotion

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

NEWS
The House of Lords has set up a select committee to examine assisted dying, which will delay the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
back-to-top-scroll