header-logo header-logo

05 June 2015
Issue: 7655 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Tort

Gulati and others v MGN Ltd [2015] EWHC 1482 (Ch), [2015] All ER (D) 199 (May)

The claimants issued proceedings for the infringements of privacy rights founded on phone hacking, private investigators and publication of articles in the defendant’s newspapers. The present eight cases were brought as part of a managed litigation to ascertain damages and give some guidance as to the damages in other cases. The Chancery Division found the claimants were entitled to compensation for more than distress. Several awards for the hacking, the blagging of personal information by the private investigators and in respect of the published articles would be appropriate, while being conscious to avoid double counting. Further, awards of aggravated damages would be appropriate.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

mfg Solicitors—Hannah Finnegan

mfg Solicitors—Hannah Finnegan

Law firm strengthens private client team to support continued growth

Devonshires—Andrew Cromb

Devonshires—Andrew Cromb

Devonshires expands offering with appointment of tax partner Andrew Cromb

Freeths—John Jones

Freeths—John Jones

Freeths strengthens senior leadership team with Chief Technology Officer appointment

NEWS
Mr Justice Nicklin’s decision to order costs on an indemnity basis may be a ‘significant win’ but it’s still ‘far from game, set and match’ for Associated Newspapers, a former costs judge has said
The Law Society RFC Festival of Sport returns next month, bringing together legal and financial services professionals for one of the sector’s largest annual sporting events
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
Can a meticulously maintained spreadsheet turn a couple’s informal financial arrangements into legally enforceable obligations? 
back-to-top-scroll