header-logo header-logo

24 February 2011
Issue: 7454 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Tort—Harassment—Prohibition of harassment

Iqbal v Dean Manson Solicitors [2011] EWCA Civ 123, [2011] All ER (D) 163 (Feb)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Rix, Smith and Richards LJJ, 15 Feb 2011

A partnership can be a defendant to a civil action under s 3 of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 (PFH 1997).

The claimant appeared in person. Christopher Brown (instructed by Thompson & Co Solicitors) for the defendant.

The claimant worked as an assistant solicitor for the defendant firm. In January 2009 the defendant issued proceedings against three defendants. Meanwhile the claimant had left and set up his own firm, and was instructed to act in the proceedings by one defendant. The defendant then wrote a series of three letters to the claimant’s firm, for the attention of the claimant.

There was only one full partner of the defendant whose name at that time was on its stationery. The three letters made allegations against the claimant’s professional and personal integrity, and stated that he had been summarily dismissed for his “continued insubordination and reckless conduct”. After receiving

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll