header-logo header-logo

Tort—Harassment—Prohibition of harassment

24 February 2011
Issue: 7454 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Iqbal v Dean Manson Solicitors [2011] EWCA Civ 123, [2011] All ER (D) 163 (Feb)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Rix, Smith and Richards LJJ, 15 Feb 2011

A partnership can be a defendant to a civil action under s 3 of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 (PFH 1997).

The claimant appeared in person. Christopher Brown (instructed by Thompson & Co Solicitors) for the defendant.

The claimant worked as an assistant solicitor for the defendant firm. In January 2009 the defendant issued proceedings against three defendants. Meanwhile the claimant had left and set up his own firm, and was instructed to act in the proceedings by one defendant. The defendant then wrote a series of three letters to the claimant’s firm, for the attention of the claimant.

There was only one full partner of the defendant whose name at that time was on its stationery. The three letters made allegations against the claimant’s professional and personal integrity, and stated that he had been summarily dismissed for his “continued insubordination and reckless conduct”. After receiving the second

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll