header-logo header-logo

01 February 2013 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7546 / Categories: Opinion , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

A touch of brilliance?

As a new legal services provider enters the market, Jon Robins investigates how the profession is responding to change

In the week that saw the emergence of Brilliant Law, the most exciting development in the newly liberalised world since the last one, a “super-survey” revealed the not very surprising picture that life for much of the incumbent profession was far from brilliant.

Research published by the Ministry of Justice (MoJ), Law Society and Legal Services Board (LSB)—heavyweight “both literally and metaphorically”, according to a Law Society Gazette editorial—concluded that recession and structural changes were “combining to create a turbulent environment” for the solicitors’ profession.

Triple whammy

No news there, then. The Gazette suggested a profession coping well with an “unprecedented triple whammy” and “making a pretty good go of it”. Well, that’s one way of reading it.

The report’s authors described the position of private practice firms’ as “increasingly precarious”. “The recession has had a significant impact on demand for legal services,” said Professor Pascoe Pleasence, Dr Nigel Balmer

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll