header-logo header-logo

08 July 2016 / Dr Tony Harvey
Issue: 7706 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Towards the new Hammurabi?

The SRA’s attempt to introduce a code of solicitors’ ethics fit for the 21st century should be applauded, says Dr Tony Harvey

  • The SRA wants a clear, easy to understand, professional code of ethics for all solicitors and an entirely separate code relating to the obligations of the business. This approach is both radical and commendable.

Codes telling humanity how to live in the “right” way are nothing new. Perhaps the first is the Code of Hammurabi dating back some 3,000 years. Codes of professional ethics have similar provenance. Many will have heard of the Hippocratic Oath (School of Hippocrates around 420 BC) providing an ethical provenance for doctors and surgeons (“those who cut for stone”). Solicitors’ ethical provenance is rather more modern—the first Guide to the Professional Conduct of Solicitors having been published in 1960.

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) is the largest regulator of solicitors in the UK and the last major review of the Solicitors Code of Conduct was in 2010 giving rise to the SRA Code of Conduct

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll