header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
08 July 2016 / Dr Tony Harvey
Issue: 7706 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Towards the new Hammurabi?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

The SRA’s attempt to introduce a code of solicitors’ ethics fit for the 21st century should be applauded, says Dr Tony Harvey
  • The SRA wants a clear, easy to understand, professional code of ethics for all solicitors and an entirely separate code relating to the obligations of the business. This approach is both radical and commendable.

Codes telling humanity how to live in the “right” way are nothing new. Perhaps the first is the Code of Hammurabi dating back some 3,000 years. Codes of professional ethics have similar provenance. Many will have heard of the Hippocratic Oath (School of Hippocrates around 420 BC) providing an ethical provenance for doctors and surgeons (“those who cut for stone”). Solicitors’ ethical provenance is rather more modern—the first Guide to the Professional Conduct of Solicitors having been published in 1960.

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) is the largest regulator of solicitors in the UK and the last major review of the Solicitors Code of Conduct was in 2010 giving rise to the SRA Code of Conduct

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: When post-breach events rewrite damages claims
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
NLJ this week: Supreme Court redraws unfair prejudice rules
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll