header-logo header-logo

21 May 2010
Issue: 7418 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Town and country planning

R (on the application of Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd) v Wolverhampton City Council and another [2010] UKSC 20, [2010] All ER (D) 98 (May)

The Supreme Court considered an appeal in respect of a compulsory purchase order made by a local authority in circumstances where for the purposes of s 226 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, in arriving at its decision, the authority had taken into consideration a commitment to develop another site.

Certain principles could be derived from case authority in the planning context: (i) the question of what was a material (or relevant) consideration for the purposes of what was s 70(2) of the 1990 Act was a question of law, but the weight to be given to it was a matter for the decision maker; (ii) financial viability might be material if it related to the development; (iii) financial dependency of part of a composite development on another part might be a relevant consideration, in the sense that the proposed development would finance other relevant planning benefits might be material; and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll