header-logo header-logo

Town and country planning

12 March 2010
Issue: 7408 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Sumner v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2010] EWHC 372 (Admin), 2010] All ER (D) 44 (Mar)

It was neither express nor to be implied in relation to s 191 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 that uses and operations, if regarded as lawful for all purposes, were to be equivalent to a planning permission. The word “also” in s 191(7) of the Act could be a reference to its additional effect, namely an effect outside the confines of the Act itself. That would be to give a natural construction to s 191, particularly in the light of s 336, which in defining planning permission did not include s 191.

Section 171B of the 1990 Act drew a distinction between change of use and operational development - that was entirely consistent with the approach of the Act. If an individual chose to erect a building without planning permission intended to be used for a purpose which had no planning permission then inevitably he would run the risk that he would have

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll