header-logo header-logo

12 March 2010
Issue: 7408 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Town and country planning

Sumner v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2010] EWHC 372 (Admin), 2010] All ER (D) 44 (Mar)

It was neither express nor to be implied in relation to s 191 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 that uses and operations, if regarded as lawful for all purposes, were to be equivalent to a planning permission. The word “also” in s 191(7) of the Act could be a reference to its additional effect, namely an effect outside the confines of the Act itself. That would be to give a natural construction to s 191, particularly in the light of s 336, which in defining planning permission did not include s 191.

Section 171B of the 1990 Act drew a distinction between change of use and operational development - that was entirely consistent with the approach of the Act. If an individual chose to erect a building without planning permission intended to be used for a purpose which had no planning permission then inevitably he would run the risk that he would have

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll