header-logo header-logo

Town and country planning

12 March 2010
Issue: 7408 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Sumner v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2010] EWHC 372 (Admin), 2010] All ER (D) 44 (Mar)

It was neither express nor to be implied in relation to s 191 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 that uses and operations, if regarded as lawful for all purposes, were to be equivalent to a planning permission. The word “also” in s 191(7) of the Act could be a reference to its additional effect, namely an effect outside the confines of the Act itself. That would be to give a natural construction to s 191, particularly in the light of s 336, which in defining planning permission did not include s 191.

Section 171B of the 1990 Act drew a distinction between change of use and operational development - that was entirely consistent with the approach of the Act. If an individual chose to erect a building without planning permission intended to be used for a purpose which had no planning permission then inevitably he would run the risk that he would have

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll