header-logo header-logo

Toxic claims

17 March 2011
Issue: 7457 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Investment banks will be hit by a rash of high value court claims over “toxic” financial products later this year, a senior commercial lawyer has predicted.

Reynolds Porter Chamberlain’s head of financial disputes, Tom Hibbert, says investors who were sold products before the credit crunch are nearing the time limit for bringing legal proceedings. There will also be an increase in products reaching their maturity date this year, which means investors will have to account for their loss.

“The courts haven’t yet clarified whether the six year limitation runs from the sale of the product or the date at which the product’s value collapsed,” he says.

“Investors do not want to risk missing the chance for their case to be heard because they waited too long, so they will start court proceedings soon. The instinct of many institutional investors has been to seek to renegotiate or restructure transactions but many of those dialogues are coming to an end.

“Moreover, if investors approached the bank that sold them the product a year or more ago the bank might have been willing to restructure the product. Now that the synthetic collateralised debt obligations (CDOs) are nearing their expiry date and it is clear that they are more or less worthless the banks may be less willing to negotiate with investors, thus forcing them into litigation.”

According to Hibbert, the main types of product involved will be synthetic CDOs.
 

Issue: 7457 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll