header-logo header-logo

17 March 2011
Issue: 7457 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Toxic claims

Investment banks will be hit by a rash of high value court claims over “toxic” financial products later this year, a senior commercial lawyer has predicted.

Reynolds Porter Chamberlain’s head of financial disputes, Tom Hibbert, says investors who were sold products before the credit crunch are nearing the time limit for bringing legal proceedings. There will also be an increase in products reaching their maturity date this year, which means investors will have to account for their loss.

“The courts haven’t yet clarified whether the six year limitation runs from the sale of the product or the date at which the product’s value collapsed,” he says.

“Investors do not want to risk missing the chance for their case to be heard because they waited too long, so they will start court proceedings soon. The instinct of many institutional investors has been to seek to renegotiate or restructure transactions but many of those dialogues are coming to an end.

“Moreover, if investors approached the bank that sold them the product a year or more ago the bank might have been willing to restructure the product. Now that the synthetic collateralised debt obligations (CDOs) are nearing their expiry date and it is clear that they are more or less worthless the banks may be less willing to negotiate with investors, thus forcing them into litigation.”

According to Hibbert, the main types of product involved will be synthetic CDOs.
 

Issue: 7457 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll