header-logo header-logo

17 March 2011
Issue: 7457 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Toxic claims

Investment banks will be hit by a rash of high value court claims over “toxic” financial products later this year, a senior commercial lawyer has predicted.

Reynolds Porter Chamberlain’s head of financial disputes, Tom Hibbert, says investors who were sold products before the credit crunch are nearing the time limit for bringing legal proceedings. There will also be an increase in products reaching their maturity date this year, which means investors will have to account for their loss.

“The courts haven’t yet clarified whether the six year limitation runs from the sale of the product or the date at which the product’s value collapsed,” he says.

“Investors do not want to risk missing the chance for their case to be heard because they waited too long, so they will start court proceedings soon. The instinct of many institutional investors has been to seek to renegotiate or restructure transactions but many of those dialogues are coming to an end.

“Moreover, if investors approached the bank that sold them the product a year or more ago the bank might have been willing to restructure the product. Now that the synthetic collateralised debt obligations (CDOs) are nearing their expiry date and it is clear that they are more or less worthless the banks may be less willing to negotiate with investors, thus forcing them into litigation.”

According to Hibbert, the main types of product involved will be synthetic CDOs.
 

Issue: 7457 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—Nathan Evans

Birketts—Nathan Evans

Commercial and technology team in Cambridgestrengthened by partner hire

Andrew & Andrew Solicitors—Shikha Datta

Andrew & Andrew Solicitors—Shikha Datta

Hampshire firm appoints head of new family department

Latham & Watkins—Sarah Lightdale

Latham & Watkins—Sarah Lightdale

Firm strengthens securities practice with partner return

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll