header-logo header-logo

26 February 2009 / Rodney Gardner
Issue: 7358 / Categories: Features , Banking , Competition , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Toxic Invasion

In the hope of writing off loans, many people are being exploited by case management companies, says Rodney Gardner

The Competition Commission (CC) has recently announced a ban on the sale of payment protection policies, at the point of sale, such requirements to be implemented by next year. Several banks have already agreed voluntarily to impose a ban now and it is thus apposite to consider the law and practice that is presently evolving with regard to such claims.

Claims management companies (CMCs) have been seeking refunds from banks for some time now on behalf of borrowers who have been sold single premium policies when applying for both secured and unsecured loans, many of the people affected being within the lower socio-economic groupings. The CC has found that policies being sold are uncompetitive, and CMCs have in the past had some success in gaining refunds on the grounds of unsuitability and/or ineligibility of the debtor.

The only way a CMC can advance a client’s claim, which is rejected, is to refer

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll