header-logo header-logo

Tracking the pandemic by numbers

10 February 2021
Issue: 7920 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Divorce , Conveyancing , Personal injury , Housing , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail
Divorce applications nearly doubled between April and July last year as couples struggled with the first lockdown, according to the Legal Services Board (LSB) COVID-19 research dashboard into the pandemic’s impact on legal services.

Data-crunching by the LSB, which oversees all eight legal services regulators, revealed a 93% rise in divorce applications during those summer months. By August, applications had dipped to below 2019 levels until a second spike of 46% between August and October, when there were fewer pandemic restrictions in place.

Domestic abuse referrals also appear to have tracked fluctuations in the pandemic, increasing 23% between April and July 2020 before dipping between August and November.

The data, published this week, also revealed a 14% drop on the previous year to 303,000 conveyancing applications to the Land Registry in December. Housing lawyers also experienced significant fluctuations, with an 87% drop between January and April 2020 followed by a partial recovery between April and July.

For personal injury lawyers, claims to the PI Claims Portal have decreased each month since April and, by December, were down 30% from the previous December.

Lawyers have handled more antisocial behaviour reports since the start of the pandemic, with reports up by 92% at their peak, in April 2020.

Wills, trusts and probate lawyers dealt with higher numbers of deaths in 2020, up 102% on the previous year between February and April 2020 and up 19% in December. Registrations of lasting power of attorney fell by two-thirds between January and May 2020, to nearly 29,000 and were 14% down in November on the previous year.

The Law Society this week urged the LSB to concentrate on recovery and access to justice in the next three years.

Responding last week to the LSB’s draft strategy and business plan consultation, Law Society president David Greene said: ‘The key challenges include the social and economic impact of the pandemic, Brexit, and years of severe under-funding in the justice system, all of which are having a significant impact on the profession, clients and wider public confidence.’

The LSB’s draft plan identified three themes for 2021-2024―fairer outcomes, stronger confidence and better services.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll