header-logo header-logo

07 May 2009 / Donald Cran
Issue: 7368 / Categories: Features , Data protection
printer mail-detail

Tracking on trial

Donald Cran reviews recent privacy developments arising out of ISPs' use of Phorm

The European Commission (EC) has begun infringement proceedings against the UK for failure to implement properly the EU Directive on protection of personal data. The action follows complaints that UK internet service providers had trialled behavioural advertising technology developed by Phorm, Inc. without users' knowledge or consent.

Phorm technology analyses site visits by internet users to determine their interests, and then delivers targeted advertising to those users when they visit certain websites.

Such advertising may benefit both vendors and customers by better matching the former's products with the latter's needs. However, its use in the UK must comply with:

      
      ●     The Data Protection Act 1998, implementing the EU Data Protection Directive 95/46/EC; and

      
      ●     The Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003 (SI 2003/2426), implementing the EU Privacy and Electronic Communication Directive 2002/58/EC on processing of personal data and protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector.

Monitoring or interception

Monitoring or interception of communications in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll