header-logo header-logo

07 May 2009 / Donald Cran
Issue: 7368 / Categories: Features , Data protection
printer mail-detail

Tracking on trial

Donald Cran reviews recent privacy developments arising out of ISPs' use of Phorm

The European Commission (EC) has begun infringement proceedings against the UK for failure to implement properly the EU Directive on protection of personal data. The action follows complaints that UK internet service providers had trialled behavioural advertising technology developed by Phorm, Inc. without users' knowledge or consent.

Phorm technology analyses site visits by internet users to determine their interests, and then delivers targeted advertising to those users when they visit certain websites.

Such advertising may benefit both vendors and customers by better matching the former's products with the latter's needs. However, its use in the UK must comply with:

      
      ●     The Data Protection Act 1998, implementing the EU Data Protection Directive 95/46/EC; and

      
      ●     The Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003 (SI 2003/2426), implementing the EU Privacy and Electronic Communication Directive 2002/58/EC on processing of personal data and protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector.

Monitoring or interception

Monitoring or interception of communications in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll