header-logo header-logo

03 March 2011
Issue: 7455 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Trade mark

Kingspan Group plc and another company v Rockwool Ltd [2011] EWHC 250 (Ch), [2011] All ER (D) 242 (Feb)

Article 5(2) of  Council Directive (EC) 2008/95 (to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks) (The TM Directive) and art 9(1)(c) of the Council Regulation (EC) 2009/207 (on the Community trade mark) (the CTM Regulation) established, for the benefit of marks with a reputation, a wider form of protection than that laid down in art 5(1) of the TM Directive or art 9(1)(b) of the CTM Regulation.

The condition of that protection consisted of a use without due cause of a sign identical with or similar to a registered mark which would take unfair advantage of, or was, or would be detrimental to the character or the repute of the earlier mark.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield welcomes new employment partner, Tom McLaughlin

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

National specialist pensions law firm strengthens team with three new appointments

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit appoints Christian Abletshauser to lead family law practice

NEWS
Burges Salmon appoints Benn Richards to strengthen Contentious Insolvency offering
A High Court decision has clarified that a home may be unfit for human habitation not only where conditions endanger health or safety, but also where they seriously undermine comfort and convenience

A longer time limit for employment tribunal claims, new charity law thresholds, property tribunal recruitment and appellate guidance on small-claims costs feature in the latest Civil Way round-up

A recent High Court ruling could make issue estoppel considerably more complex in cross-border litigation, requiring parties to consider the foreign law governing the underlying claim
The Supreme Court has overturned Cheshire West’s bright-line test for deprivation of liberty, replacing it with a broader, more contextual assessment that gives greater weight to an individual’s wishes, feelings and apparent consent
back-to-top-scroll