header-logo header-logo

16 November 2012
Issue: 7538 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Trade mark

Hollister Incorporated and another company v Medik Ostomy Supplies Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 1419, [2012] All ER (D) 114 (Nov)

Article 13 of Parliament and Council Directive (EC) 2004/48 (on the enforcement of intellectual property rights) did not require a court undertaking an account of the profits made by the infringer to adjust that account by reference to the profits lost by the right holder. It was incumbent on national authorities to adopt appropriate measures to deal with infringements, including infringements resulting from a failure to give notice. Such measures had to be proportionate, and they had to satisfy the principles of equivalence and effectiveness. An account of profits did not compensate the trade mark owner for the losses he had suffered. It simply deprived the infringer of the profits he had made from an activity in which he should never have engaged. Therefore, it ensured the infringer had not benefited from his wrong, but contained no element of punishment. Moreover, as an equitable remedy, it might be refused if, for any reason, it would produce an

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers to be joined by leading family law set, 4 Brick Court, this summer

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Real estate and construction energy offering boosted by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Firm bolsters real estate team with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS
A wave of housing and procedural reforms is set to test the limits of tribunal capacity. In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold charts sweeping change as the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 begins biting
Plans to reduce jury trials risk missing the real problem in the criminal justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, David Wolchover of Ridgeway Chambers argues the crown court backlog is fuelled not by juries but weak cases slipping through a flawed ‘50%’ prosecution test
Emerging technologies may soon transform how courts determine truth in deeply personal disputes. In this week's NLJ, Madhavi Kabra of 1 Hare Court and Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers explore how neurotechnology could reshape family law
A controversial protest case has reignited debate over the limits of free expression. In NLJ this week, Nicholas Dobson examines a Quran-burning incident testing public order law
The courts have drawn a firm line under attempts to extend arbitration appeals. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester highlights that if the High Court refuses permission under s 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, that is the end
back-to-top-scroll