header-logo header-logo

20 October 2017
Issue: 7766 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Trade mark

Abanka d. d. v Abanca Corporación Bancaria, S. A. [2017] EWHC 2428 (Ch), [2017] All ER (D) 80 (Oct)

A hearing officer had revoked two of the appellant’s international trade mark registrations for the word ‘ABANKA’ (concerning financial services) and she had dismissed the appellant’s opposition to the respondent’s application to register the mark ‘ABANCA’. The Chancery Division, in allowing the appeal in part, held that the hearing officer’s overall approach to the central issues had been within the range of reasonable ways of applying the general guidance of the authorities to the evidence before her, save in respect of her decision on use of the ABANKA marks concerning the London Stock exchange listing of Eurobonds in 2009. The court held that the use of the ABANKA marks in relation to such bonds sold in the UK amounted to use of the marks in the UK. Accordingly, the appeal was allowed to that limited extent.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—James Paterson

Charles Russell Speechlys—James Paterson

Charles Russell Speechlys further bolsters Private Equity expertise with the appointment of James Paterson

Ellisons—Samuel Flower

Ellisons—Samuel Flower

Ellisons strengthens Rural Affairs team with senior appointment

Sidley—Carl Hotton

Sidley—Carl Hotton

Sidley adds insurance mergers and acquisitions partner to London office

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll