header-logo header-logo

31 January 2014
Issue: 7592 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Trade marks

Healey Sports Cars Switzerland Ltd v Jensen Cars Ltd [2014] EWHC 24 (Pat), [2014] All ER (D) 158 (Jan)

It was settled law that the approach of the appellate court in trade mark appeals was that, unless the court was satisfied that a hearing officer had made an error of principle, it should be reluctant to interfere. It was settled law that genuine use meant actual use of the mark by the proprietor or a third party with authority to use the mark. The use had to be more than merely “token”, which meant that it should not serve solely to preserve the rights conferred by the registration. The use had to be consistent with the essential function of a trade mark and had to be by way of real commercial exploitation of the mark on the market for the relevant goods or services. All the relevant facts and circumstances had to be taken into account in determining whether there was real commercial exploitation of the mark. Use of the mark needed not always be quantitatively significant

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll