header-logo header-logo

04 April 2014
Issue: 7601 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Trademarks

Deutsche Bank AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) T-291/12, [2014] All ER (D) 279 (Mar)

A mark consisting of an advertising slogan should be regarded as devoid of distinctive character if it was liable to be perceived by the relevant public as a mere promotional formula. On the other hand, such a mark should be recognised as distinctive, if, apart from its promotional function, it might be perceived immediately as an indication of the commercial origin of the goods or services in question. 

In the light of the principles of equal treatment and sound administration, it was true that the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market should, when examining an application for registration of a Community trade mark, take into account the decisions already taken in respect of similar applications and consider with especial care whether it should decide in the same way or not. However, the way in which the principles of equal treatment and sound administration were applied had to be consistent with respect for legality. Consequently, a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll