header-logo header-logo

Trading standards

11 November 2016 / Dr Chris Pamplin
Issue: 7722 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail
nlj_7722_pamplin

Chris Pamplin looks at how greater exposure to litigants in person is also exposing expert witnesses to consumer law

Until recently, it was rare for an expert witness to contract direct with a litigant. Indeed, having a lawyer as a buffer between you and the litigant is generally a very good thing, not least when your independence leads you to express opinions the litigant doesn’t like. However, the savage cuts in public funding and restrictions on cost recovery mean that courts are seeing a massive increase in the number of litigants in person. As a consequence, more experts are being asked to work direct with “consumers”, and it opens a whole new can of worms.

Consumer law landscape

The Consumer Contracts (Information, Cancellation and Additional Charges) Regulations 2013 (SI 2013/3134) (CCR 2013) and the Consumer Rights Act 2015 (CRA 2015) have ushered in some significant changes to the law in relation to consumer contracts for the supply of goods and services. Experts who are instructed by litigants in person, and create contracts with them,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll