header-logo header-logo

Trainee wins case against firm

24 May 2023
Issue: 8026 / Categories: Legal News , Employment , Profession
printer mail-detail
A trainee solicitor has won a breach of contract claim against his former firm after it changed the office location days before his start date.

In Osvald v Holden and Co LLP (2300453/2022), the employment tribunal found the terms had been agreed orally at a meeting and confirmed by email, including salary, hours, start date, location and that the firm would pay for a parking space near the Hastings office so the claimant, who is the primary child carer, could make the school runs. Osvald also visited the office for an induction.

Four days before he was due to start, the firm placed him in the Ashford, Kent location.

Awarding Osvald four weeks’ pay, Employment Judge McLaren held that an employment contract was formed and changing the place of work amounted to a fundamental breach.

Issue: 8026 / Categories: Legal News , Employment , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll