header-logo header-logo

Training officers of the court in the age of AI

253197
© Getty images
Elisabeth Mason seeks to calm the shivers from the ruling in Cork and another v Smith

As artificial intelligence (AI) continues to transform legal practice, we are becoming used to regular complaints from the judiciary of England and Wales about the inappropriate use of AI before the courts. Barely a week goes by without another judgment admonishing a lawyer or litigant-in-person. Most of these cases have involved individuals using AI tools without much oversight or suitable safeguards.

On 22 May 2026, however, a judgment was published which sent a shiver down the spines of many law firm leaders: Cork and another v Smith [2026] EWHC 1199 (Ch). This time, the guilty party was not an individual rogue actor, but a large multinational law firm with the resources to invest in AI tools with appropriate safeguards and which is known to have recently invested in training around AI.

In case you missed the judgment, here is a short summary. A newly qualified solicitor

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Switalskis—five appointments

Switalskis—five appointments

Firm expands national abuse compensation team

Mathys & Squire—nine promotions

Mathys & Squire—nine promotions

IP firm announces new partners and senior promotions across UK offices

Carey Olsen—five promotions

Carey Olsen—five promotions

Carey Olsen promotes five lawyers to the partnership

NEWS
Executors may be overlooking billions of pounds in estate assets hidden in forgotten investments and misplaced share certificates
Britain’s booming non-surgical cosmetics market is operating in what some critics describe as a regulatory ‘Wild West’
Family contact disputes are becoming an increasingly prominent feature of Court of Protection litigation
Material obtained through US discovery applications may have a much longer legal life than many litigants realise
English courts are developing a distinctly practical approach to sanctions disputes arising from Russia’s invasion of Ukraine
back-to-top-scroll