header-logo header-logo

Training officers of the court in the age of AI

253197
© Getty images
Elisabeth Mason seeks to calm the shivers from the ruling in Cork and another v Smith

As artificial intelligence (AI) continues to transform legal practice, we are becoming used to regular complaints from the judiciary of England and Wales about the inappropriate use of AI before the courts. Barely a week goes by without another judgment admonishing a lawyer or litigant-in-person. Most of these cases have involved individuals using AI tools without much oversight or suitable safeguards.

On 22 May 2026, however, a judgment was published which sent a shiver down the spines of many law firm leaders: Cork and another v Smith [2026] EWHC 1199 (Ch). This time, the guilty party was not an individual rogue actor, but a large multinational law firm with the resources to invest in AI tools with appropriate safeguards and which is known to have recently invested in training around AI.

In case you missed the judgment, here is a short summary. A newly qualified solicitor

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll