header-logo header-logo

Transform justice, but don’t wreck it

03 November 2017 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7768 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail
nlj_7768_roger_smith

The principle of digitalisation has been left without Parliamentary backing in the wake of Brexit, says Roger Smith

Transform Justice is a young charity established in 2012 by a former magistrate, Penelope Gibbs. She is clearly a formidable operator and has edited a devastating report (Defendants on video – conveyor belt justice or a revolution in access?) on digitalisation in the English and Welsh criminal courts.

A background issue, to which Ms Gibbs alludes but does not draw out, is that senior figures in the judiciary have been persuaded to support government policies which may sound fine in theory but are problematic in practice. This is the downside of the more public role given to judges like the Lord Chief Justice with the demise of the former role of the Lord Chancellor. The support of senior judiciary like Lord Leveson, Lord Justice Briggs and Lord Thomas for the principle of digitalisation has perhaps impeded their objective articulation of the practical deficiencies. The judges are particularly exposed because promised legislative authority for

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bloomsbury Square Employment Law—Donna Clancy

Bloomsbury Square Employment Law—Donna Clancy

Employment law team strengthened with partner appointment

mfg Solicitors—Matt Smith

mfg Solicitors—Matt Smith

Corporate solicitor joins as partner in Birmingham

Freeths—Joe Lythgoe

Freeths—Joe Lythgoe

Corporate director with expertise in creative industries joins mergers and acquisitions team

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll