header-logo header-logo

Transform justice, but don’t wreck it

03 November 2017 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7768 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail
nlj_7768_roger_smith

The principle of digitalisation has been left without Parliamentary backing in the wake of Brexit, says Roger Smith

Transform Justice is a young charity established in 2012 by a former magistrate, Penelope Gibbs. She is clearly a formidable operator and has edited a devastating report (Defendants on video – conveyor belt justice or a revolution in access?) on digitalisation in the English and Welsh criminal courts.

A background issue, to which Ms Gibbs alludes but does not draw out, is that senior figures in the judiciary have been persuaded to support government policies which may sound fine in theory but are problematic in practice. This is the downside of the more public role given to judges like the Lord Chief Justice with the demise of the former role of the Lord Chancellor. The support of senior judiciary like Lord Leveson, Lord Justice Briggs and Lord Thomas for the principle of digitalisation has perhaps impeded their objective articulation of the practical deficiencies. The judges are particularly exposed because promised legislative authority for

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Winckworth Sherwood—Arcangelo D’Apolito

Winckworth Sherwood—Arcangelo D’Apolito

Private wealth and tax offering boosted by dual qualified partner hire

Sackers—John Card

Sackers—John Card

Pensions firm announces hire in project management team

Myers & Co—Kerry Boyle

Myers & Co—Kerry Boyle

Staffordshire firm appoints head of commercial property

NEWS
NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925 
HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)
NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll