header-logo header-logo

Transform justice, but don’t wreck it

03 November 2017 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7768 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail
nlj_7768_roger_smith

The principle of digitalisation has been left without Parliamentary backing in the wake of Brexit, says Roger Smith

Transform Justice is a young charity established in 2012 by a former magistrate, Penelope Gibbs. She is clearly a formidable operator and has edited a devastating report (Defendants on video – conveyor belt justice or a revolution in access?) on digitalisation in the English and Welsh criminal courts.

A background issue, to which Ms Gibbs alludes but does not draw out, is that senior figures in the judiciary have been persuaded to support government policies which may sound fine in theory but are problematic in practice. This is the downside of the more public role given to judges like the Lord Chief Justice with the demise of the former role of the Lord Chancellor. The support of senior judiciary like Lord Leveson, Lord Justice Briggs and Lord Thomas for the principle of digitalisation has perhaps impeded their objective articulation of the practical deficiencies. The judges are particularly exposed because promised legislative authority for

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

University of Manchester: The LLM driving tech-focused career growth

University of Manchester: The LLM driving tech-focused career growth

Manchester’s online LLM has accelerated career progression for its graduates

mfg Solicitors—Philip Chapman

mfg Solicitors—Philip Chapman

Regional firm strengthens corporate team with partner hire

Switalskis—Sally Christey, Mathew Abiagom & Cyman Kaur

Switalskis—Sally Christey, Mathew Abiagom & Cyman Kaur

Commercial property team expands with trio of appointments

NEWS
Judging is ‘more intellectually demanding than any other role in public life’—and far messier than outsiders imagine. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC reflects on decades spent wrestling with unclear legislation, fragile precedent and human fallibility
The long-predicted death of the billable hour may finally be here—and this time, it’s armed with a scythe. In a sweeping critique of time-based billing, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, argues in this week's NLJ that artificial intelligence has made hourly charging ‘intellectually, commercially and ethically indefensible’
From fake authorities to rent reform, the civil courts have had a busy start to 2026. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold surveys a procedural landscape where guidance, discretion and discipline are all under strain
Fact-finding hearings remain a fault line in private family law. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Rylatt and Robyn Laye of Anthony Gold Solicitors analyse recent appeals exposing the dangers of rushed or fragmented findings
As the Winter Olympics open in Milan and Cortina, legal disputes are once again being resolved almost as fast as the athletes compete. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Ian Blackshaw of Valloni Attorneys examines the Court of Arbitration for Sport’s (CAS's) ad hoc divisions, which can decide cases within 24 hours
back-to-top-scroll