header-logo header-logo

Transform justice, but don’t wreck it

03 November 2017 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7768 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail
nlj_7768_roger_smith

The principle of digitalisation has been left without Parliamentary backing in the wake of Brexit, says Roger Smith

Transform Justice is a young charity established in 2012 by a former magistrate, Penelope Gibbs. She is clearly a formidable operator and has edited a devastating report (Defendants on video – conveyor belt justice or a revolution in access?) on digitalisation in the English and Welsh criminal courts.

A background issue, to which Ms Gibbs alludes but does not draw out, is that senior figures in the judiciary have been persuaded to support government policies which may sound fine in theory but are problematic in practice. This is the downside of the more public role given to judges like the Lord Chief Justice with the demise of the former role of the Lord Chancellor. The support of senior judiciary like Lord Leveson, Lord Justice Briggs and Lord Thomas for the principle of digitalisation has perhaps impeded their objective articulation of the practical deficiencies. The judges are particularly exposed because promised legislative authority for

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll