header-logo header-logo

Translation service

02 May 2014 / Sarah Crowther KC
Issue: 7604 / Categories: Features , Damages , Personal injury
printer mail-detail
new_web_crowther

Sarah Crowther examines practical guidance for assessing PI damages under a foreign law

In the first decision of the English courts since the entry into force of Rome II (EC Regulation 864/2007), Wall v Mutuelle de Poitiers Assurances [2014] EWCA Civ 138, seeks to set out the new approach to assessment of damages in personal injury claims to which a foreign law applies.

 

This article considers how much guidance Wall has provided and which issues remain open-ended.

Applying foreign law to a claim in the Courts of England & Wales

Since 1996, for all tort issues in a case with a foreign element, the English and Welsh courts have had to apply the “choice of law” rules, sometimes leading to the substantive law of another country being applied to an action proceeding domestically. Pursuant to the Private International Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1995, the heads of recoverable loss, together with other substantive law concepts such as duty to mitigate and contributory fault, would be governed by the foreign applicable law. However,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll