header-logo header-logo

02 May 2014 / Sarah Crowther KC
Issue: 7604 / Categories: Features , Damages , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Translation service

new_web_crowther

Sarah Crowther examines practical guidance for assessing PI damages under a foreign law

In the first decision of the English courts since the entry into force of Rome II (EC Regulation 864/2007), Wall v Mutuelle de Poitiers Assurances [2014] EWCA Civ 138, seeks to set out the new approach to assessment of damages in personal injury claims to which a foreign law applies.

 

This article considers how much guidance Wall has provided and which issues remain open-ended.

Applying foreign law to a claim in the Courts of England & Wales

Since 1996, for all tort issues in a case with a foreign element, the English and Welsh courts have had to apply the “choice of law” rules, sometimes leading to the substantive law of another country being applied to an action proceeding domestically. Pursuant to the Private International Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1995, the heads of recoverable loss, together with other substantive law concepts such as duty to mitigate and contributory fault, would be governed by the foreign applicable law. However,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll