header-logo header-logo

Transparency rules, ok?

21 May 2009 / Geraldine Morris
Issue: 7370 / Categories: Features , Media , Procedure & practice , Family
printer mail-detail

Geraldine Morris outlines the recent rule changes arising from granting media access to family courts

Few areas of law are as newsworthy to the media as family proceedings. Following a concerted campaign by pressure groups and various government consultations, the family courts were opened to the media from the 27 April 2009. The media have quickly realised however that that access is subject to stringent rules.

Family proceedings courts

The Family Proceedings Courts (Miscellaneous Amendments) Rules 2009 (SI 2009/858) came into effect from the 27 April 2009 amending the Family Proceedings Courts (Children Act 1989) Rules 1991 (SI 1991/1395) and the Family Proceedings Courts (Child Support Act 1991) Rules 1993 (SI 1993/627).

The amendments concern the attendance of persons, in particular representatives of the media, during proceedings in the family proceedings court relating to children, and the communication of information relating to such proceedings. The new rules insert into the Family Proceedings Courts (Children Act 1989) Rules 1991 a new r 16A, which provides for who may be present during a hearing

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Writing in NLJ this week, Thomas Rothwell and Kavish Shah of Falcon Chambers unpack the surprise inclusion of a ban on upwards-only rent reviews in the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll