header-logo header-logo

11 July 2025 / Sarah Everington , Alex Adams , Farida Hindi
Issue: 8124 / Categories: Features , Family , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Trapped by ‘I do’

225411
Predatory marriages are exploiting the weaknesses of current wills law: Sarah Everington, Alex Adams & Farida Hindi set out what can be done to safeguard vulnerable adults
  • Predatory marriage weaponises English law’s automatic will-revocation and intestacy rules to trap isolated or cognitively impaired adults into unions for financial gain.
  • Pre- or post-nuptial agreements, capacity assessments and marriage-caveats can flag undue influence, but remain non-binding without robust legislative backing.
  • The Law Commission’s 2025 proposals to abolish will-revocation on marriage and shift the burden of proving undue influence seek to deter exploiters and uphold vulnerable testators’ wishes.
  • Until then, proactive legal advice, regular familial engagement and increased public awareness remain the most effective tools of prevention.

Legal practitioners are increasingly finding themselves at the intersection of safeguarding vulnerable individuals and navigating complex legal frameworks. Recent developments and highly publicised debates such as the assisted dying Bill and the Law Commission’s 2025 ‘Modernising Wills’ report have reignited national discussion around the protection of vulnerable adults during

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll