header-logo header-logo

19 April 2018
Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Trauma continues for exonerees

Despite the trauma of wrongful imprisonment, victims of miscarriage of justice receive inadequate compensation and follow-up support on release, a major report by civil rights group Justice has revealed.

An average of 21 convictions are quashed each year, but the number of successful compensation claims is far less. In 2014/15, for example, there were 20 quashed convictions and one successful compensation application. In 2015/16 there were 17 quashed convictions and two successful applications.

Currently, Justice say, the application process for exonerees is ‘burdensome and complex’ and the compensation award is capped. However, much more than financial compensation is needed to help people adjust to life on the outside.

Currently, exonerees are released with no state support other than £46 and a travel voucher. By contrast, prisoners attend courses on the practicalities of life after release in the last 12 weeks of their sentence.

In its report, Supporting Exonerees: Ensuring Accessible, Consistent and Continuing Support, Justice records how one exoneree, who had learning disabilities, was discharged in December in a T-shirt, with his belongings in two clear plastic bags stamped ‘HM Prison Service’ and had no one to meet him at the gates. Exonerees frequently struggle with mental health problems and have difficulties maintaining relationships.

Justice makes 14 recommendations for reform, including: the provision of specialist psychiatric care; a residential service to offer practical and welfare support to exonerees; an independent body to determine eligibility for compensation; automatic compensation for wrongful imprisonment; and an apology and explanation for the failure that leads to a quashed conviction.

Jodie Blackstock, legal director of Justice, said: ‘Our recommendations are ambitious but if we are to address the complex needs that exonerees face on release, they are necessary.

‘People who are wrongly imprisoned often experience trauma, which can make returning to everyday life incredibly challenging. Financial support is hard to obtain and doesn’t solve the problem. Exonerees require accessible, consistent and continuing support to start rebuilding their lives outside prison.’

Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Regulatory team boosted by partner hire amid rising health and safety demand

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Legal director promoted to partner at specialist pensions firm

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Residential development capability expands with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll