header-logo header-logo

19 April 2018
Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Trauma continues for exonerees

Despite the trauma of wrongful imprisonment, victims of miscarriage of justice receive inadequate compensation and follow-up support on release, a major report by civil rights group Justice has revealed.

An average of 21 convictions are quashed each year, but the number of successful compensation claims is far less. In 2014/15, for example, there were 20 quashed convictions and one successful compensation application. In 2015/16 there were 17 quashed convictions and two successful applications.

Currently, Justice say, the application process for exonerees is ‘burdensome and complex’ and the compensation award is capped. However, much more than financial compensation is needed to help people adjust to life on the outside.

Currently, exonerees are released with no state support other than £46 and a travel voucher. By contrast, prisoners attend courses on the practicalities of life after release in the last 12 weeks of their sentence.

In its report, Supporting Exonerees: Ensuring Accessible, Consistent and Continuing Support, Justice records how one exoneree, who had learning disabilities, was discharged in December in a T-shirt, with his belongings in two clear plastic bags stamped ‘HM Prison Service’ and had no one to meet him at the gates. Exonerees frequently struggle with mental health problems and have difficulties maintaining relationships.

Justice makes 14 recommendations for reform, including: the provision of specialist psychiatric care; a residential service to offer practical and welfare support to exonerees; an independent body to determine eligibility for compensation; automatic compensation for wrongful imprisonment; and an apology and explanation for the failure that leads to a quashed conviction.

Jodie Blackstock, legal director of Justice, said: ‘Our recommendations are ambitious but if we are to address the complex needs that exonerees face on release, they are necessary.

‘People who are wrongly imprisoned often experience trauma, which can make returning to everyday life incredibly challenging. Financial support is hard to obtain and doesn’t solve the problem. Exonerees require accessible, consistent and continuing support to start rebuilding their lives outside prison.’

Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll