header-logo header-logo

19 April 2018
Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Trauma continues for exonerees

Despite the trauma of wrongful imprisonment, victims of miscarriage of justice receive inadequate compensation and follow-up support on release, a major report by civil rights group Justice has revealed.

An average of 21 convictions are quashed each year, but the number of successful compensation claims is far less. In 2014/15, for example, there were 20 quashed convictions and one successful compensation application. In 2015/16 there were 17 quashed convictions and two successful applications.

Currently, Justice say, the application process for exonerees is ‘burdensome and complex’ and the compensation award is capped. However, much more than financial compensation is needed to help people adjust to life on the outside.

Currently, exonerees are released with no state support other than £46 and a travel voucher. By contrast, prisoners attend courses on the practicalities of life after release in the last 12 weeks of their sentence.

In its report, Supporting Exonerees: Ensuring Accessible, Consistent and Continuing Support, Justice records how one exoneree, who had learning disabilities, was discharged in December in a T-shirt, with his belongings in two clear plastic bags stamped ‘HM Prison Service’ and had no one to meet him at the gates. Exonerees frequently struggle with mental health problems and have difficulties maintaining relationships.

Justice makes 14 recommendations for reform, including: the provision of specialist psychiatric care; a residential service to offer practical and welfare support to exonerees; an independent body to determine eligibility for compensation; automatic compensation for wrongful imprisonment; and an apology and explanation for the failure that leads to a quashed conviction.

Jodie Blackstock, legal director of Justice, said: ‘Our recommendations are ambitious but if we are to address the complex needs that exonerees face on release, they are necessary.

‘People who are wrongly imprisoned often experience trauma, which can make returning to everyday life incredibly challenging. Financial support is hard to obtain and doesn’t solve the problem. Exonerees require accessible, consistent and continuing support to start rebuilding their lives outside prison.’

Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll