header-logo header-logo

Tread carefully

28 October 2011 / Georgina Squire
Issue: 7487 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Litigators beware: settlement may not be good news, warns Georgina Squire

The most satisfying part of a litigator’s role is often settling a dispute. However, two recent decisions demostrate the risks involved. They offer words of warning and lessons to be learned for every litigation solicitor negotiating a settlement on behalf of their client.

Settling claim without authority

Amalgamated Metal Corporation Plc v Wragge & Co [2011] EWHC 887 (Comm), [2011] All ER (D) 114 (Apr) concerned tax litigation in which Wragge was acting for the Amalgamated Metal Corporation Plc (AMC). The main allegation against the solicitor firm was that it settled a claim without its client’s authority, in breach of its retainer and was negligent.

On the primary case of want of authority, AMC succeeded. The judge reached his conclusion based on both the documentary and witness evidence. He concluded that Wragge had never put the final offer to the client, so the client had not had the opportunity of considering it or instructing Wragge to accept it. One of the main

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Red Lion Chambers—Maurice MacSweeney

Red Lion Chambers—Maurice MacSweeney

Set creates new client and business development role amid growth

Kingsley Napley—Tim Lowles

Kingsley Napley—Tim Lowles

Sports disputes practice launchedwith partner appointment

mfg Solicitors—Tom Evans

mfg Solicitors—Tom Evans

Tax and succession planning offering expands with returning partner

NEWS
The rank of King’s Counsel (KC) has been awarded to 96 barristers, and no solicitors, in the latest silk round
Neurotechnology is poised to transform contract law—and unsettle it. Writing in NLJ this week, Harry Lambert, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers and founder of the Centre for Neurotechnology & Law, and Dr Michelle Sharpe, barrister at the Victorian Bar, explore how brain–computer interfaces could both prove and undermine consent
Comparators remain the fault line of discrimination law. In this week's NLJ, Anjali Malik, partner at Bellevue Law, and Mukhtiar Singh, barrister at Doughty Street Chambers, review a bumper year of appellate guidance clarifying how tribunals should approach ‘actual’ and ‘evidential’ comparators. A new six-stage framework stresses a simple starting point: identify the treatment first
In cross-border divorces, domicile can decide everything. In NLJ this week, Jennifer Headon, legal director and head of international family, Isobel Inkley, solicitor, and Fiona Collins, trainee solicitor, all at Birketts LLP, unpack a Court of Appeal ruling that re-centres nuance in jurisdiction disputes. The court held that once a domicile of choice is established, the burden lies on the party asserting its loss
Can a chief constable be held responsible for disobedient officers? Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth, professor of public law at De Montfort University, examines a Court of Appeal ruling that answers firmly: yes
back-to-top-scroll