header-logo header-logo

24 June 2026
Issue: 8167 / Categories: Legal News , Regulatory , Compliance
printer mail-detail

Treasury insists shift in AML supervision will be smooth

The treasury has sought to reassure the legal profession over concerns about cost, bureaucracy and independence when the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) takes over regulation of anti-money laundering compliance

It set out its proposal to bring lawyers and accountants under FCA supervision in its ‘Anti-money laundering/counter terrorist-financing (AML/CTF) supervision reform: duties, powers, and accountability’ consultation, which closed in December.

Responding to the consultation last week, the treasury said opponents, who were ‘mainly from the legal sector’, had argued the switch was ‘unnecessary, duplicative, and incompatible with existing regulatory frameworks.

‘Many noted that solicitors, barristers and other legal professionals already undergo rigorous statutory fitness and propriety assessments, and warned that a parallel FCA administered test would add cost and friction without providing additional AML benefit. Concerns were also raised that FCA testing could interfere with the independence of legal regulators or contradict their decisions, leading to uncertainty over who has primacy in assessing professional suitability,’ it said.

However, treasury minister Rachel Blake, writing in the foreword, said the government’s approach was to ‘build on existing powers where they are sufficient... while aiming to ensure that any new powers are proportionate and do not create extra burdens on firms’.

The treasury response stated: ‘To support a smooth transition, the government expects the FCA to be able to make use of existing checks where appropriate and to operate processes that avoid unnecessary duplication.’ It assured legal and accountancy sectors would not be brought within scope of reg 58, which covers integrity, competence and compliance history, prior to transition, to avoid ‘multiple sequential changes’.

Lawyers had also sought clarity on the FCA’s information gathering and inspection powers. The treasury said the FCA would not be able to require disclosure ‘of any document which attracts legal professional privilege’. However, it was ‘essential’ to have ‘clear understanding’ about what documentation might be required during a supervisory visit and how privileged information should be redacted from files. Accordingly, the FCA will put guidance in place to ensure clarity.

The treasury warned the FCA would be prepared to go through the courts to prevent any abuse of privilege by criminally complicit or wilfully negligent legal professionals.

Issue: 8167 / Categories: Legal News , Regulatory , Compliance
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis will mark the 80th anniversary of Shawcross and Beaumont on Air Law with a live podcast exploring the evolution of aviation law from the Chicago Convention to the challenges facing modern aerospace, taking place on Tuesday 29 September
Harmony Christian Ministries is the latest charity to benefit from a £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
Foreign judgment creditors have gained a route to recovery after the Supreme Court’s ruling in Drelle v Servis-Terminal
Surrogacy is growing in popularity, but parents-to-be face a complex legal framework
Winning a judgment may be only the beginning of an expensive enforcement battle, writes Professor Dominic Regan in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll