header-logo header-logo

24 June 2026
Issue: 8167 / Categories: Legal News , Regulatory , Compliance
printer mail-detail

Treasury insists shift in AML supervision will be smooth

The treasury has sought to reassure the legal profession over concerns about cost, bureaucracy and independence when the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) takes over regulation of anti-money laundering compliance

It set out its proposal to bring lawyers and accountants under FCA supervision in its ‘Anti-money laundering/counter terrorist-financing (AML/CTF) supervision reform: duties, powers, and accountability’ consultation, which closed in December.

Responding to the consultation last week, the treasury said opponents, who were ‘mainly from the legal sector’, had argued the switch was ‘unnecessary, duplicative, and incompatible with existing regulatory frameworks.

‘Many noted that solicitors, barristers and other legal professionals already undergo rigorous statutory fitness and propriety assessments, and warned that a parallel FCA administered test would add cost and friction without providing additional AML benefit. Concerns were also raised that FCA testing could interfere with the independence of legal regulators or contradict their decisions, leading to uncertainty over who has primacy in assessing professional suitability,’ it said.

However, treasury minister Rachel Blake, writing in the foreword, said the government’s approach was to ‘build on existing powers where they are sufficient... while aiming to ensure that any new powers are proportionate and do not create extra burdens on firms’.

The treasury response stated: ‘To support a smooth transition, the government expects the FCA to be able to make use of existing checks where appropriate and to operate processes that avoid unnecessary duplication.’ It assured legal and accountancy sectors would not be brought within scope of reg 58, which covers integrity, competence and compliance history, prior to transition, to avoid ‘multiple sequential changes’.

Lawyers had also sought clarity on the FCA’s information gathering and inspection powers. The treasury said the FCA would not be able to require disclosure ‘of any document which attracts legal professional privilege’. However, it was ‘essential’ to have ‘clear understanding’ about what documentation might be required during a supervisory visit and how privileged information should be redacted from files. Accordingly, the FCA will put guidance in place to ensure clarity.

The treasury warned the FCA would be prepared to go through the courts to prevent any abuse of privilege by criminally complicit or wilfully negligent legal professionals.

Issue: 8167 / Categories: Legal News , Regulatory , Compliance
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys senior leadership appointments

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths strengthens London Construction and Engineering practice with two strategic senior hires

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins announces strategic hire to deepen skills base in the social business sector

NEWS
Existing defamation law can respond to AI ‘hallucinations’, but allocating responsibility will prove harder where outputs reach users without human intervention
The High Court has upheld a rare successful serious-irregularity challenge after an arbitrator relied on an implied term neither party had advanced
Thirty years after The Future of Law shook a profession still using fax machines, its central forecast looks increasingly less like prophecy and more like description
More than 100 teams from the legal and financial services sectors competed in five sports at the 51st Law Society RFC Festival of Sport earlier this month
Part-time status need only be an effective cause of less favourable treatment, rather than the sole cause, the Supreme Court has held in Augustine v Data Cars
back-to-top-scroll