header-logo header-logo

Triggering justice

19 April 2012 / Elizabeth Carley , Richard Scorer
Issue: 7510 / Categories: Opinion , Damages , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Richard Scorer & Elizabeth Carley salute an overdue victory

The Supreme Court handed down its keenly anticipated decision in the employers’ liability trigger litigation (ELTL) mesothelioma test cases on 28 March (BAI v Durham [2012] UKSC 14). The court examined the various forms of wording used in employers’ liability (EL) policies and unanimously held that there is no legal difference between policies which are written on an “injury sustained/contracted” basis to those written on an “injury caused” basis. Regardless of precise wording, policy cover for mesothelioma claims is triggered by the date of exposure to asbestos. This sensible and humane decision clears up the confusion caused by the Court of Appeal’s earlier ruling in the ELTL cases, but still leaves some questions unanswered.

The trigger litigation featured six test cases concerning the scope of an insurer’s obligation to indemnify employers against their liabilities to their employee victims. Difficulties first arose following the 2006 public liability (PL) mesothelioma case of Bolton MBC v Municipal Mutual Insurance [2006] EWCA Civ 50. Bolton held

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Writing in NLJ this week, Thomas Rothwell and Kavish Shah of Falcon Chambers unpack the surprise inclusion of a ban on upwards-only rent reviews in the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll