header-logo header-logo

Trouble brewing

15 November 2007 / Steve Gallagher
Issue: 7297 / Categories: Features , Discrimination
printer mail-detail

Will the new religious hate law help or hinder the cause of freedom? Steve Gallagher wonders

Despite the Racial and Religious Hatred Act 2006 (RRHA 2006) receiving Royal Assent on 16 February 2006, it was hoped by many commentators that no commencement order would ever be made for this potentially troublesome Act.

Unfortunately for them, the Racial and Religious Hatred Act 2006 (Commencement No1) Order (SI 2490/2007) has implemented most of RRHA 2006 into the law of England and Wales from 1 October 2007.
After long debate over the original Bill the House of Lords watered down the government’s proposals, significantly affecting their impact:
- Unlike racial offences the offences must be “threatening” not just “abusive” or “insulting”.
- The words, actions, materials, recordings etc must also be “intended” to stir up religious hatred.
- Section 29B—the offence may be committed in a public or private place, but there is no offence if “the words or behaviour are used, or the written material displayed”, inside a dwelling and only heard or seen by other persons inside that or another private

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll