header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
15 November 2007 / Steve Gallagher
Issue: 7297 / Categories: Features , Discrimination
printer mail-detail

Trouble brewing

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Will the new religious hate law help or hinder the cause of freedom? Steve Gallagher wonders

Despite the Racial and Religious Hatred Act 2006 (RRHA 2006) receiving Royal Assent on 16 February 2006, it was hoped by many commentators that no commencement order would ever be made for this potentially troublesome Act.

Unfortunately for them, the Racial and Religious Hatred Act 2006 (Commencement No1) Order (SI 2490/2007) has implemented most of RRHA 2006 into the law of England and Wales from 1 October 2007.
After long debate over the original Bill the House of Lords watered down the government’s proposals, significantly affecting their impact:
- Unlike racial offences the offences must be “threatening” not just “abusive” or “insulting”.
- The words, actions, materials, recordings etc must also be “intended” to stir up religious hatred.
- Section 29B—the offence may be committed in a public or private place, but there is no offence if “the words or behaviour are used, or the written material displayed”, inside a dwelling and only heard or seen by other persons inside that or another

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Switalskis—Naila Arif, Harriet Findlay & Ellie Thompson

Switalskis—Naila Arif, Harriet Findlay & Ellie Thompson

Firm awards training contracts to paralegals through internal programme

Ward Hadaway—Matthew Morton

Ward Hadaway—Matthew Morton

Private client disputes specialist joins commercial litigation team

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Nina Hood

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Nina Hood

Cumbria firm appoints new head of residential property

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
NLJ this week: Family law urged to ditch adversarial instincts
Family law must shift from conflict-driven litigation to child-centred problem-solving, according to a major new report. Writing in NLJ this week, Caroline Bowden of Anthony Gold outlines findings showing overwhelming support for reform, with 92% agreeing lawyers owe duties to children as well as clients
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll