header-logo header-logo

Trust wins discrimination appeal

12 April 2016
Issue: 7694 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

No unlawful discrimination took place when an NHS Trust disciplined a Christian employee for improperly promoting her religious beliefs.

Wasteney v East London NHS Trust (App No. UKEAT/0157/15/LA) concerned the Trust’s action after receiving complaints against Wasteney of religious “grooming” from a more junior employee of Muslim faith. The alleged “grooming” consisted of “praying with the junior worker and the laying on of hands, giving a book to that worker, which concerned the conversion to Christianity of a Muslim woman, and inviting her to various services and events at the claimant’s church”. After investigation, the Trust found Wasteney guilty of serious misconduct, namely the blurring of professional boundaries and the subjection of a junior colleague to improper pressure and unwanted conduct. She was given a final written warning, reduced on appeal to a first written warning.

Judge Eady QC dismissed the appeal, stating in her judgment that: “The claimant was not subjected to disciplinary process or sanction because she manifested her religious belief in voluntary and consensual exchanges with a colleague but because—as the employment tribunal expressly found—she subjected a subordinate to unwanted and unwelcome conduct, going substantially beyond ‘religious discussion’, without regard to her own influential position. 

“The treatment of which the claimant complained was because of, and related to, those inappropriate actions; not any legitimate manifestation of her belief.” 

Employment law specialist Dr John McMullen, a partner at Wrigleys, says: "This case confirms that everyone has the right to manifest their religion and that to discipline someone for doing so would be unlawful discrimination. 

“However an employer would be entitled to discipline someone for subjecting (as in this case) a junior colleague to unwanted pressure and unwelcome conduct by foisting their religion on them. The right to manifest one's religion can include an element of proselytization but an employer is entitled to take reasonable action to protect the rights of another person who simply does not want to give up their own religion."

Issue: 7694 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll