header-logo header-logo

TUPE bites law firm

02 April 2009
Issue: 7363 / Categories: Legal News , TUPE
printer mail-detail

Employment

 TUPE has been found to apply to solicitors firms, in the first case of its kind.
An employment tribunal ruled The Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) regulations applied where Southport firm Barnetts solicitors won a contract to do conveyancing from the Britannia Building Society. Six Lees Lloyd Whitley solicitors and support staff, who had worked on the Britannia contract, resigned when Barnetts took over the contract. They claimed Barnetts had repudiated their contracts.

In Royden v Barnetts, Barnetts argued that TUPE did not apply. The tribunal, however, unanimously held that two of Lees Lloyd Whitley’s employees had transferred.

The tribunal found Barnetts had unfairly dismissed two of the employees, and had failed in their duty to consult.

Issue: 7363 / Categories: Legal News , TUPE
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll