header-logo header-logo

TUPE regs apply to transfers outside UK

10 January 2008
Issue: 7303 / Categories: Legal News , TUPE
printer mail-detail

News

The TUPE regulations could apply in relation to the transfer of a UK-based business even if the purchaser is outside the EU, following an Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) ruling.

In GMB v Holis Metal Industries Ltd the EAT held that TUPE did potentially apply to transfers outside the UK, although it conceded that enforcement of tribunal awards might prove tricky.

Judge Ansell was hearing an appeal against an employment tribunal’s refusal to strike out a claim brought against Holis—the Israeli buyer of part of UK business Newall—relating to alleged breaches of the duty to inform and consult under reg 13 of the TUPE regulations. Holis argued that TUPE and/or the Acquired Rights Directive could not apply transnationally but the EAT disagreed.

Dr John McMullen, partner and head of employment at Watson Burton, says the case will be of considerable interest to practitioners in this area and those who advise on cross-border transfers of undertakings.

He says: “I have consistently argued that there is a strong case for any obligation that is engaged prior to the transfer should be caught by TUPE even if the UK-based business is then transferred outside the jurisdiction.
“However, this case takes the argument a step further by accepting, as a generality, the potentiality or the application of TUPE against a foreign based transferee either in the EU or outside the EU.”

McMullen adds: “Employers should seek indemnities against the possibility of TUPE claims on cross-border transfers. Those advising foreign transferees would be negligent not to consider negotiating such indemnities.”

Issue: 7303 / Categories: Legal News , TUPE
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
back-to-top-scroll