header-logo header-logo

Turning back the clock on court delays

01 September 2023 / Natasha Grande
Issue: 8038 / Categories: Features , Family , Child law , Procedure & practice , ADR
printer mail-detail
135278
With delays in private children cases continuing to climb, Natasha Grande urges family practitioners to take action to resist such slowdowns becoming the norm
  • Data from the Ministry of Justice is showing a growing delay in private children work in the family courts.
  • Multiple factors have contributed to this, including the COVID-19 pandemic and the removal of legal aid for private cases.
  • Family practitioners can play their part in mitigating the impact of the delays on their clients by advocating for dispute resolution options.

The Law Society has raised alarm bells over the increasing delays in private children work within the family courts. For practitioners specialising in family law and handling children cases, this will not come as a surprise—we frequently find ourselves dedicating considerable time to following up with the courts, and arguing how these delays negatively impact the wellbeing of the children involved and the parties. Unfortunately, despite efforts to address this issue, children continue to face uncertainties due to these delays.

Numbers

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll