header-logo header-logo

01 September 2023 / Natasha Grande
Issue: 8038 / Categories: Features , Family , Child law , Procedure & practice , ADR
printer mail-detail

Turning back the clock on court delays

135278
With delays in private children cases continuing to climb, Natasha Grande urges family practitioners to take action to resist such slowdowns becoming the norm
  • Data from the Ministry of Justice is showing a growing delay in private children work in the family courts.
  • Multiple factors have contributed to this, including the COVID-19 pandemic and the removal of legal aid for private cases.
  • Family practitioners can play their part in mitigating the impact of the delays on their clients by advocating for dispute resolution options.

The Law Society has raised alarm bells over the increasing delays in private children work within the family courts. For practitioners specialising in family law and handling children cases, this will not come as a surprise—we frequently find ourselves dedicating considerable time to following up with the courts, and arguing how these delays negatively impact the wellbeing of the children involved and the parties. Unfortunately, despite efforts to address this issue, children continue to face uncertainties due to these delays.

Numbers

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll