header-logo header-logo

Tweet tweet, say lawyers

12 December 2018
Issue: 7821 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Time to take a strategic approach to social media

The legal Twitterati and LinkedIn users lead the social media field among lawyers, a report shows.

Both sites were rated highest in terms of influence and effectiveness by law firms and chambers surveyed by NLJ in association with legal PR consultancy Kysen. They were followed by Facebook and Instagram, while other platforms flagged up included Pinterest, Google+, WeChat, Snapchat and Paper.li, a content curation service.

Respondents also highlighted legal platform Juriosity, which offers a knowledge network and professional directory.

Catherine Calder, joint CEO of Serjeants’ Inn Chambers and co-chair of the Legal Practice Management Association, said: ‘It is the new shop window.

‘Previously, the news page on our website was our key platform for knowledge-sharing and announcing chambers’ developments. Now we push everything out via social media.

‘It is clear from both the engagement statistics and from anecdotal evidence that that this is how we are reaching clients and contacts.’

However, different platforms have different uses, she said. While Twitter helps law firms and chambers connect with students, pupils and legal commentators, LinkedIn is a better platform for clients, with posts ‘leading directly to new work’.

The report advises taking a strategic approach to social media, as would be the case with any other communications. For example, they should ‘think logically through who your target audiences are and what you need to be saying to them to achieve your aims’, according to Fred Banning, head of corporate communications at Pinsent Mason. Combining press coverage in the still-powerful traditional press with social media activity to push the message out works very well.

There are also risks—innocent-seeming posts can go spectacularly wrong; hastily typed out tweets can go viral. The survey found that some firms are closing their Twitter accounts or tightening up their monitoring and setting clear policies so staff are accountable.

The full report, written by journalist Grania Langdon-Down, is published by NLJ this week, and available as a PDF below.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll