header-logo header-logo

Umbrella proceedings orders: come rain or shine

23 June 2023 / Annabel Elliott
Issue: 8030 / Categories: Features , Competition , Collective action
printer mail-detail
127507
Novel methods of case management & consolidation are emerging in the Competition Appeal Tribunal: Annabel Elliott considers the umbrella proceedings order one year on
  • Umbrella proceedings are a novel form of case management and consolidation of separate but related proceedings. They are aimed at reducing the risk of inconsistent judgments, and are particularly relevant for competition disputes as potential claimants may ultimately claim independently for the same loss.
  • Such proceedings may bring benefits to litigants by potentially encouraging settlement; conversely, they may delay the host proceedings, or be used by defendants as a tactical device for driving a wedge between classes of claimants.

Separate proceedings which arise from the same or similar facts require careful consideration as to how best they can be case-managed. A court may order the consolidation of separate proceedings, even if different claimants and defendants are involved, where, for example, there are common questions of law or fact.

In June 2022, the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) introduced a novel method of dealing

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll