header-logo header-logo

23 June 2023 / Annabel Elliott
Issue: 8030 / Categories: Features , Competition , Collective action
printer mail-detail

Umbrella proceedings orders: come rain or shine

127507
Novel methods of case management & consolidation are emerging in the Competition Appeal Tribunal: Annabel Elliott considers the umbrella proceedings order one year on
  • Umbrella proceedings are a novel form of case management and consolidation of separate but related proceedings. They are aimed at reducing the risk of inconsistent judgments, and are particularly relevant for competition disputes as potential claimants may ultimately claim independently for the same loss.
  • Such proceedings may bring benefits to litigants by potentially encouraging settlement; conversely, they may delay the host proceedings, or be used by defendants as a tactical device for driving a wedge between classes of claimants.

Separate proceedings which arise from the same or similar facts require careful consideration as to how best they can be case-managed. A court may order the consolidation of separate proceedings, even if different claimants and defendants are involved, where, for example, there are common questions of law or fact.

In June 2022, the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) introduced a novel method of dealing

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll