header-logo header-logo

23 June 2023 / Annabel Elliott
Issue: 8030 / Categories: Features , Competition , Collective action
printer mail-detail

Umbrella proceedings orders: come rain or shine

127507
Novel methods of case management & consolidation are emerging in the Competition Appeal Tribunal: Annabel Elliott considers the umbrella proceedings order one year on
  • Umbrella proceedings are a novel form of case management and consolidation of separate but related proceedings. They are aimed at reducing the risk of inconsistent judgments, and are particularly relevant for competition disputes as potential claimants may ultimately claim independently for the same loss.
  • Such proceedings may bring benefits to litigants by potentially encouraging settlement; conversely, they may delay the host proceedings, or be used by defendants as a tactical device for driving a wedge between classes of claimants.

Separate proceedings which arise from the same or similar facts require careful consideration as to how best they can be case-managed. A court may order the consolidation of separate proceedings, even if different claimants and defendants are involved, where, for example, there are common questions of law or fact.

In June 2022, the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) introduced a novel method of dealing

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll