header-logo header-logo

Unchart(er)ed waters

20 January 2011 / Cordelia Rayner , Charles Brasted
Issue: 7449 / Categories: Features , Public , EU , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Has the charter of fundamental rights of the European Union taken the UK into new legal territory ask Charles Brasted & Cordelia Rayner

Since 1998, under the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998), the main articles of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention) are directly enforceable in UK law through the domestic courts.

HRA 1998 not only embedded the well-established human rights into UK law but also provided a number of protective measures for them, namely by: 

  • requiring legislation to be read and given effect consistently with the Convention (s 3);
  • making it unlawful for “public authorities” to act incompatibly with Convention rights, unless primary legislation required them to do so (s 6); and
  • giving the courts the power to make “declarations of incompatibility” regarding legislation that could not be interpreted in accordance with the Convention, thus triggering a power (but not an obligation) for the appropriate minister to amend the offending legislation using a “fast-track” parliamentary procedure (ss 4 and 10, respectively).

Undoubtedly HRA 1998 raised the importance

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll