header-logo header-logo

Unconventional?

10 December 2009 / David Lock
Issue: 7397 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights
printer mail-detail

David Lock examines Human Rights Act claims & the doctrine of precedent

Every law student learns how the theory of precedent works in practice. Statute law has supreme authority, but after that the House of Lords, or now the Supreme Court, binds the Court of Appeal; the Court of Appeal binds the High Court.

Precedent is ageless. It does not matter how long ago the Court of Appeal pronounced on a matter; no High Court judge can overturn that decision until it is distinguished by another Court of Appeal or overturned by the Supreme Court. But what happens if a lower court has to wrestle with a Human Rights Act 1998 point which has not been raised in previous cases?

Public bodies

The Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998) s 6 provides that all public bodies are required to comply with the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention). Judges are public bodies for these purposes. Hence judges are required by an Act of Parliament to produce judgments which comply with the Convention. If there

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll