header-logo header-logo

10 December 2009 / David Lock
Issue: 7397 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Unconventional?

David Lock examines Human Rights Act claims & the doctrine of precedent

Every law student learns how the theory of precedent works in practice. Statute law has supreme authority, but after that the House of Lords, or now the Supreme Court, binds the Court of Appeal; the Court of Appeal binds the High Court.

Precedent is ageless. It does not matter how long ago the Court of Appeal pronounced on a matter; no High Court judge can overturn that decision until it is distinguished by another Court of Appeal or overturned by the Supreme Court. But what happens if a lower court has to wrestle with a Human Rights Act 1998 point which has not been raised in previous cases?

Public bodies

The Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998) s 6 provides that all public bodies are required to comply with the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention). Judges are public bodies for these purposes. Hence judges are required by an Act of Parliament to produce judgments which comply with the Convention. If there

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll