header-logo header-logo

Under new rule(s)

28 March 2019 / Bethan Walsh
Issue: 7834 / Categories: Features , Charities
printer mail-detail

Bethan Walsh reviews the changes to the automatic disqualification rules for trustees

  • Understanding the changes to the automatic disqualification rules for trustees.
  • What is a relevant senior manager position?
  • What steps should charities take?
  • Effect of automatic disqualification.

The rules regarding automatic disqualification for trustees changed on 1 August 2018. In particular, more reasons to disqualify an individual from acting as a trustee have been added and the new rules also apply to certain senior manager positions within charities. In summary, charities should avoid appointing or retaining trustees or senior managers who are disqualified, unless the Charity Commission has given a waiver. In this regard, it is important to understand these changes and the steps that charities should take to avoid falling foul of the rules.

Understanding the changes

Prior to 1 August 2018, the circumstances in which trustees could be disqualified was fairly narrow. They related mainly to issues around bankruptcy and unspent convictions for crimes involving dishonesty or deception. 

The new rules widen the list of circumstances in which individuals are automatically

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll