header-logo header-logo

Under pressure?

17 February 2012 / David Greene
Issue: 7501 / Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

David Greene considers the implications of the reform of the county court system

You could knock me down with a feather. The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has listened substantively and acted upon the response of consultees to a consultation paper.

Last March the MoJ issued a consultation paper—Solving disputes in the county courts: creating a simpler, quicker and more proportionate system. It was, and remains, unclear what, if anything, we might draw from the reference to “solving” rather than “resolving disputes”. Tweet your answers to me @LitLawyer.

Attacking the “claims culture”

This was part of a series of papers issued on both cutting the cost of civil litigation and attacking what was coined as a “claims culture”. Also, lying in the foreground, were the cuts in the civil justice budget which led to the ongoing closure of a substantial proportion of the county court establishment. In the consultation paper the MoJ made a number of proposals:
 

  • increasing the financial limit for Road Traffic Act fixed fee claims;
  • a simplified claims procedure
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll