header-logo header-logo

Under pressure?

17 February 2012 / David Greene
Issue: 7501 / Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

David Greene considers the implications of the reform of the county court system

You could knock me down with a feather. The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has listened substantively and acted upon the response of consultees to a consultation paper.

Last March the MoJ issued a consultation paper—Solving disputes in the county courts: creating a simpler, quicker and more proportionate system. It was, and remains, unclear what, if anything, we might draw from the reference to “solving” rather than “resolving disputes”. Tweet your answers to me @LitLawyer.

Attacking the “claims culture”

This was part of a series of papers issued on both cutting the cost of civil litigation and attacking what was coined as a “claims culture”. Also, lying in the foreground, were the cuts in the civil justice budget which led to the ongoing closure of a substantial proportion of the county court establishment. In the consultation paper the MoJ made a number of proposals:
 

  • increasing the financial limit for Road Traffic Act fixed fee claims;
  • a simplified claims procedure
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll