header-logo header-logo

Under pressure? New business tenancies

28 September 2017 / Rupert Reed KC
Issue: 7763 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Rupert Reed QC puts the security of the landlord’s rights under the spotlight

  • In an age of increasing uncertainty for businesses, we can expect greater numbers of tenants to seek new tenancies of shorter terms and with early breaks.
  • The court must determine whether the tenant’s claim is fair and reasonable and will do so by comparing the hardship to each of the parties.

It is usually assumed that the tenant wants a longer lease than the landlord wishes to grant. The courts then seek a fair and reasonable solution by balancing two rival considerations.

  • First, there is a statutory policy of giving a tenant who has established itself in business in particular premises security of tenure.
  • Second, there is a countervailing concern that such security should not be at the expense of stifling redevelopment.

Recent economic insecurity has, however, stood that assumption on its head. There are now business tenants who, while they want a new tenancy, seek a much shorter term, and one terminable with early and frequent

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll