header-logo header-logo

28 September 2017 / Rupert Reed KC
Issue: 7763 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Under pressure? New business tenancies

Rupert Reed QC puts the security of the landlord’s rights under the spotlight

  • In an age of increasing uncertainty for businesses, we can expect greater numbers of tenants to seek new tenancies of shorter terms and with early breaks.
  • The court must determine whether the tenant’s claim is fair and reasonable and will do so by comparing the hardship to each of the parties.

It is usually assumed that the tenant wants a longer lease than the landlord wishes to grant. The courts then seek a fair and reasonable solution by balancing two rival considerations.

  • First, there is a statutory policy of giving a tenant who has established itself in business in particular premises security of tenure.
  • Second, there is a countervailing concern that such security should not be at the expense of stifling redevelopment.

Recent economic insecurity has, however, stood that assumption on its head. There are now business tenants who, while they want a new tenancy, seek a much shorter term, and one terminable with early and frequent

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll