header-logo header-logo

An uneasy pairing?

20 September 2018 / Veronica Cowan
Issue: 7809 / Categories: Features , Profession , Property , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail
nlj_7809_cowan

Veronica Cowan puts the relationship between conveyancing solicitors & professional indemnity insurers under the spotlight

  • Insurers are exercising caution when dealing with conveyancing law firms, a trend heightened by Dreamvar.

Conveyancing is the riskiest area for professional indemnity insurers (PII), and those conveyancing lawyers yet to renew will be burnishing their risk profiles in the wake of Dreamvar v Mishcon de Reya and ors [2018] EWCA Civ 1082. In Dreamvar, the Court of Appeal spread the loss, sustained after a fraudster pretended to sell a property, between the solicitors for both buyer and seller because both were insured. Consequently, conveyancers’ PIIs may well want to see risk management measures in place when conducting due diligence on sellers, if they didn’t already.

Observers note that questions asked by purchasers’ solicitors, on property information forms and similar documents, have already become more intrusive and searching in recent times. ‘We have seen an increase in the number of enquiries raised by buyers’ solicitors and there is definitely an increased reliance on the seller’s

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll