header-logo header-logo

14 February 2008 / Rupert Mead
Issue: 7308 / Categories: Features , Public , Family , Housing
printer mail-detail

Uneasy succession

Rupert Mead investigates succession on death for Cohabitants

On death, certain types of asset will pass to a surviving cohabitant independently of any will, including property held by the cohabitants as joint tenants which passes by survivorship (typically houses and bank accounts) and certain types of nominated property, eg death in service benefits. For most other types of property, including real property held by cohabitants as tenants in common, the only way to ensure that a surviving cohabitant will benefit is by making a will. In the absence of one, a cohabitant will have no automatic right to anything in his deceased partner’s estate and the intestacy rules contained in the Administration of Estates Act 1925 (AEA 1925) will apply.

 
INTESTACY RULES
Under AEA 1925, an intestate person’s estate is divided between certain members of his family (children, then parents, then siblings, and so on in the statutory order), and failing any family, it will pass as bona vacantia to the Crown (or the Duchy of Lancaster or Duke of Cornwall where
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll