header-logo header-logo

14 February 2008 / Rupert Mead
Issue: 7308 / Categories: Features , Public , Family , Housing
printer mail-detail

Uneasy succession

Rupert Mead investigates succession on death for Cohabitants

On death, certain types of asset will pass to a surviving cohabitant independently of any will, including property held by the cohabitants as joint tenants which passes by survivorship (typically houses and bank accounts) and certain types of nominated property, eg death in service benefits. For most other types of property, including real property held by cohabitants as tenants in common, the only way to ensure that a surviving cohabitant will benefit is by making a will. In the absence of one, a cohabitant will have no automatic right to anything in his deceased partner’s estate and the intestacy rules contained in the Administration of Estates Act 1925 (AEA 1925) will apply.

 
INTESTACY RULES
Under AEA 1925, an intestate person’s estate is divided between certain members of his family (children, then parents, then siblings, and so on in the statutory order), and failing any family, it will pass as bona vacantia to the Crown (or the Duchy of Lancaster or Duke of Cornwall where
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll