header-logo header-logo

Uneasy succession

14 February 2008 / Rupert Mead
Issue: 7308 / Categories: Features , Public , Family , Housing
printer mail-detail

Rupert Mead investigates succession on death for Cohabitants

On death, certain types of asset will pass to a surviving cohabitant independently of any will, including property held by the cohabitants as joint tenants which passes by survivorship (typically houses and bank accounts) and certain types of nominated property, eg death in service benefits. For most other types of property, including real property held by cohabitants as tenants in common, the only way to ensure that a surviving cohabitant will benefit is by making a will. In the absence of one, a cohabitant will have no automatic right to anything in his deceased partner’s estate and the intestacy rules contained in the Administration of Estates Act 1925 (AEA 1925) will apply.

 
INTESTACY RULES
Under AEA 1925, an intestate person’s estate is divided between certain members of his family (children, then parents, then siblings, and so on in the statutory order), and failing any family, it will pass as bona vacantia to the Crown (or the Duchy of Lancaster or Duke of Cornwall where appropriate).
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

Constantine Law—Alex Finch & Rebecca Tester

Constantine Law—Alex Finch & Rebecca Tester

Firm launches business immigration practice with dual partner hire

Freeths—Jane Dickers

Freeths—Jane Dickers

Scottish offering strengthened with dispute resolution partner hire in Glasgow

NEWS
Lawyers can no longer afford to ignore the metaverse, says Jacqueline Watts of Allin1 Advisory in this week's NLJ. Far from being a passing tech fad, virtual platforms like Roblox host thriving economies and social interactions, raising real legal issues
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
Writing in NLJ this week, Thomas Rothwell and Kavish Shah of Falcon Chambers unpack the surprise inclusion of a ban on upwards-only rent reviews in the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
back-to-top-scroll