header-logo header-logo

14 February 2008 / Rupert Mead
Issue: 7308 / Categories: Features , Public , Family , Housing
printer mail-detail

Uneasy succession

Rupert Mead investigates succession on death for Cohabitants

On death, certain types of asset will pass to a surviving cohabitant independently of any will, including property held by the cohabitants as joint tenants which passes by survivorship (typically houses and bank accounts) and certain types of nominated property, eg death in service benefits. For most other types of property, including real property held by cohabitants as tenants in common, the only way to ensure that a surviving cohabitant will benefit is by making a will. In the absence of one, a cohabitant will have no automatic right to anything in his deceased partner’s estate and the intestacy rules contained in the Administration of Estates Act 1925 (AEA 1925) will apply.

 
INTESTACY RULES
Under AEA 1925, an intestate person’s estate is divided between certain members of his family (children, then parents, then siblings, and so on in the statutory order), and failing any family, it will pass as bona vacantia to the Crown (or the Duchy of Lancaster or Duke of Cornwall where
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll