header-logo header-logo

An unexplored arena: Pt 1

23 October 2014 / Nick Rowles-Davies
Issue: 7627 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

In the first article of a two-part series, Nick Rowles-Davies highlights the need for education surrounding litigation funding

Litigation funding is an effective tool that assists in bringing valid claims to court which otherwise may not have seen the light of day. To those seeking justice and with a meritorious case, it is often a lifeline.

After taking careful steps for a number of years in the UK, litigation funding is growing and being used more openly by law firms. Not only does litigation finance aid claimants, it also helps lawyers who, with a funded case, know they can see an action through to the end.

But there is still an issue around the lack of wider education of litigation funding—also known as third party litigation funding—in some corners of the legal world.

There are many law firms and litigators who have a good understanding of funding and what it can do for their clients, cases and indeed the law firm itself. There are others who have unfounded reservations about using the mechanism,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll