header-logo header-logo

09 January 2015 / Nick Rowles-Davies
Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

An unexplored arena: Pt 2

Nick Rowles-Davies discusses due diligence, risk & insurance in his second article on litigation funding trends

Anyone familiar with the process of litigation will recognise two things: first, it is not cheap, and second, there is no guarantee of a successful outcome. As a result, when someone is deciding whether to litigate or not they are in no small part making a decision about risk—namely, is this litigation an investment worth making, or am I throwing good money after bad?

Litigation finance is a means to alleviate both cost risk and litigation risk fears for a potential claimant. In essence, an external investor will step into the claimant’s shoes and take over a pre-agreed share of the risks. Funding arrangements thus bring claimant and financier together into a close partnership, regulated by a contract, in which risk, due diligence of that risk, and insurance against risk are tightly interlinked.

Risk

By entering into their contractual arrangement, client and funder form a consensus on several key agreements: the budget needed to fund the case;

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll