header-logo header-logo

05 October 2011
Issue: 7484 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Unfair dismissal claims upheaval

Rise in qualifying period for unfair dismissal claims

The qualifying period for unfair dismissal will rise from one to two years from next April, Chancellor George Osborne has confirmed.

The government said the move, which aims to prevent vexatious or unmeritorious claims, would affect about 2,000 claimants and save employers nearly £6m a year.

Fees will be introduced for claimants bringing a claim before an employment tribunal—£250 to lodge a claim and £1,000 for a hearing, with higher fees applicable where claims were worth more than £30,000, according to unconfirmed reports. The fee would be recoverable in the event of a win, and waived for claimants with “no money”— although what this means has not been defined.

A Ministry of Justice spokesman said more details would be announced in a consultation paper due to be published next month.

Emma Satyamurti, employment solicitor at Russell, Jones & Walker, said: “The reasons given for the reforms don’t hold water—the employment tribunals already have powers to require a claimant to pay a deposit.”

Selwyn Bligh, employment partner at Pinsent Masons, said the introduction of fees would “deter people with legitimate grievances but little money from bringing a claim”.

He warned that the doubling of the qualifying period might be subject to an age discrimination challenge on the basis it indirectly discriminates against young people.

Research by Lewis Silkin estimates the number of qualifying employees under the age of 20 would be reduced from half to just one in five.

The qualifying period was raised to two years in 1980. A claim of indirect sex discrimination was brought in 2000, on the basis fewer women work continuously for two years, but it failed. In 1999, the Labour government changed the qualifying period back to a year.

Issue: 7484 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
The winners of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2026 have now been announced, marking another outstanding celebration of excellence, innovation, and impact across the legal profession
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
back-to-top-scroll