header-logo header-logo

05 January 2012
Issue: 7495 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Unfair dismissal—Constructive dismissal—Damages

Edwards v Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust; Botham v Ministry of Defence [2011] UKSC 58, [2011] All ER (D) 101 (Dec)

Supreme Court, Lord Phillips P, Lord Walker, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr, Lord Dyson and Lord Wilson SCJJ, 14 Dec 2011

The reasoning in Johnson v Unisys Ltd [2001] UKHL 13, [2001] 2 All ER 801 applies so as to preclude recovery of damages for loss arising from the unfair manner of a dismissal in breach of an express term of an employment contract.

Mark Sutton QC and Marcus Pilgerstorfer (instructed by DAC Beachcroft LLP) for the first appellant. Wendy Outhwaite QC (instructed by Treasury Solicitors) for the second appellant. Mary O’Rourke QC and Oliver Williamson (instructed by Ryan Solicitors) for the first respondent. Frederic Reynold QC and Philip Mead (instructed by Dean Wilson LLP) for the second respondent.

The respondents had been dismissed by the appellants, their respective employers, following allegations of misconduct. Both respondents issued claims in the High Court for damages for breach of their

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll