header-logo header-logo

Unfair dismissal led to £1m award

28 November 2018
Issue: 7819 / Categories: Legal News , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-detail

A former NHS employee has been awarded £1m compensation after being unfairly dismissed following an incident in a hospital car park.

The claim, before Judge Sage at London (South) Employment Tribunal, Croydon (Hastings v King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Case No: 2300394/2016) was brought by Richard Hastings, a former IT manager at the Trust. Hastings was accused of assault in 2015 after attempting to note down a delivery van’s registration number and to defend himself when racially abused and assaulted by the delivery driver. 

Hastings called hospital security for help but no record of the call was logged and nobody came to his aid, although the security office confirmed they had received the call. He was subsequently dismissed for gross misconduct.

However, the tribunal found the disciplinary processes of the hospital trust were biased and discriminatory. Failings included a difference in treatment between the contractors in the delivery van and Hastings, a British man of Caribbean descent, whose evidence was shown to have been treated with distrust and disbelief. The tribunal found Hastings to be an honest witness, while identifying inconsistencies and flaws in the opposing evidence.

Hastings was represented by Louise Brown, solicitor, and Carole Spencer, paralegal, at Excello Law. Brown said: ‘The tribunal found that the Trust's initial investigation into Mr Hastings' suspension was “fundamentally flawed” and served only to support the organisation's bias towards our client.

‘The substantial damages awarded by the tribunal reflect the significant loss of Mr Hastings’ pension rights following his dismissal and serve as a timely reminder to employers with final salary schemes in place that a failure to follow fair, unbiased and thorough disciplinary procedures, that are not tainted with discrimination, can result in huge compensation awards.’

Issue: 7819 / Categories: Legal News , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll