header-logo header-logo

Unhappy families

23 September 2010 / Linda Lee
Issue: 7434 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Family
printer mail-detail

The LSC has narrowed the options for access to justice. Linda Lee explains why the profession must fight back

In late August the Law Society formally commenced judicial review proceedings of the Legal Services Commission’s (LSC’s) recent family tender exercise, which cut the number of firms able to do family law legal aid work from 2,400 to 1,300 and severely threatens access to justice.

The society was forced to take these steps because the LSC has brought about a situation where there is likely to be inadequate availability of lawyers for care proceedings, and where in future many people, including the victims of domestic violence, will be unable to find a lawyer close enough to them who is willing and able to take on their case. In addition, the clients of around 1,000 firms face serious disruption, and the LSC appears to have no measures in place to handle the transitional chaos.

The LSC still seems to be in denial about the severity of the implications for vulnerable clients, which has left them unable

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll